Re: [Ntp] WGLC: draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp

Martin Langer <mart.langer@ostfalia.de> Thu, 08 November 2018 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mart.langer@ostfalia.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3166130E10 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:46:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sonia.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBgW9ODZrdmj for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate1.sonia.de (mailgate1.sonia.de [141.41.1.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3382124408 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:46:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate1.sonia.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 91DFD137F9; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 08:46:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.sonia.de (mail.sonia.de [141.41.8.70]) by mailgate1.sonia.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA80137F2; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 08:46:50 +0100 (CET)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Received: from [141.41.39.246] (unknown [141.41.39.246]) by mail.sonia.de (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.37.0 64bit (built Jan 25 2016)) with ESMTPSA id <0PHV006Q96Y2X300@mail.sonia.de>; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 08:46:50 +0100 (CET)
Sender: mart.langer@ostfalia.de
To: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Cc: ntp@ietf.org
References: <FF5E07A6-6F59-4D45-A186-7FC7C9B4A41C@isoc.org> <CAOp4FwRbKQLEwjzcnUhkjVo=uYGvMd05xWr35aADugXTcPi9NQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Langer <mart.langer@ostfalia.de>
Message-id: <9f8c95d1-af60-c107-77a7-d3f62c1b8583@ostfalia.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 08:47:00 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0
In-reply-to: <CAOp4FwRbKQLEwjzcnUhkjVo=uYGvMd05xWr35aADugXTcPi9NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 181107-0, 07.11.2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sonia.de; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:in-reply-to; s=20140129; bh=SoBFmKBWPwXFAeKKOvaMDU6lLbXyQg3/q2MRNnKRejA=; b=FgXBE3gyFKevEVhYK8Wv/zflKwp5MIF/yt7YVvpZJL2LEko55VjBdMVrB6wP9v1uWzmQNjzyUerGq9eesU8UhJNNzTmit05KglxGnFOTKD+dHPVbXqRGXr1jbeHPV2hIKygb8GkuWjoW4JxRu6Rwy2g3o2FTMdnmWJQ7+erDG4o=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/5h7Up12f4x0Y4F6DVHFXJFWonME>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] WGLC: draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 07:46:56 -0000

Hello Loganaden,

thanks for the feedback. I think RTT efficiency has no advantage in the 
NTS context, because it is not important for the NTS key exchange.

best regards,
Martin

Am 08.11.2018 um 08:25 schrieb Loganaden Velvindron:
> Hi All,
>
> Section 3 third paragraph says:
>
> "
>
>     Implementations MUST NOT negotiate TLS versions earlier than 1.2,
>     SHOULD negotiate TLS 1.3 [RFC8446] or later when possible, and MAY
>     refuse to negotiate any TLS version which has been superseded by a
>     later supported version.
>
> "
>
> My suggestion would be to encourage the use of TCP Fast Open (RFC7413)
> to achieve
> better RTT efficiency, especially if using TLS 1.2.
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:46 AM Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> This message initiates a three plus week working group last call for:
>>
>> Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp/
>>
>> Please review the referenced document and send any comments to the mailing list including your assessment of whether this document is mature enough to proceed to the IESG. Please note that these messages of support for progression to the mailing list will be used to determine WG consensus to proceed.
>>
>> Please send all comments in by COB on Friday 30 November. We realize this is a bit longer than normal but we are coming out of an IETF week and heading into the Thanksgiving holiday in the US.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Karen and Dieter
>> _______________________________________________
>> ntp mailing list
>> ntp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

-- 
Martin Langer, M.Eng.
Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften
- Hochschule Braunschweig/Wolfenbüttel
University of Applied Sciences

Labor Datentechnik, Labor Design Digitaler Systeme
Fakultät Elektrotechnik
Salzdahlumer Straße 46/48
38302 Wolfenbüttel
Germany

Tel. : +49 5331 939 43370
Web  : https://www.ostfalia.de/cms/de/pws/bermbach/mitarbeiter/martin-langer