Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for NTP) to Proposed Standardsecurity
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Tue, 09 February 2021 10:30 UTC
Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6E83A153D for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 02:30:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.37
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id keA-ONLHJEPJ for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 02:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3A723A153B for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 02:30:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612866605; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=B5iOdJnTTkCIy8GJWoVCXXZzI6Z4AR3hXATUt5Xd3HI=; b=S4V8Ms2bu/0L7lYyYdqNe3dIYtlT8IavI0FxM3yt9n7fzS741+rwUbJkQmNeuskjuOICZv UTVgjdDCRC1RQleoMD8FpQB8+R0vjNcYJMzXrmc94T2unsbcttjXDKlJss62L77sA5BYx6 mxxu1SGjAuXUsv1m8W1z0NByYeocw7E=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-203-MSCIGGMfMuaNeDx0T0qeSg-1; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 05:30:03 -0500
X-MC-Unique: MSCIGGMfMuaNeDx0T0qeSg-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2138107ACE4 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (holly.tpb.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com [10.43.134.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67AC117AE2 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 11:29:48 +0100
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210209102948.GA1903164@localhost>
References: <daedulus@btconnect.com> <60212265.6020204@btconnect.com> <20210209093446.E11F8406061@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210209093446.E11F8406061@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mlichvar@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/77Yl3ESoqTME_-J_j0GYpRaPJoY>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for NTP) to Proposed Standardsecurity
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:30:09 -0000
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 01:34:46AM -0800, Hal Murray wrote: > Existing NTP code also supports SHA-1 > > RFC 8573 that deprecated using MD5 with NTP suggests using AES-CMAC. Note > that is CMAC rather than HMAC and that NTP uses it's own scheme rather than > HMAC as described in RFC 6151. > > The NTPsec code supports any hash (or CMAC) algorithm that the underlying > library from OpenSSL supports. There is also NTS. The model doesn't seem to have an option to enable that. This brings a question how can be the YANG model extended with new, possibly implementation-specific, options, or new values for some options. For example, the model says minpoll and maxpoll have a range of 4..17, but no implementation that I know follows that. -- Miroslav Lichvar
- [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-… The IESG
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Harlan Stenn
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <dra… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: … Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <dra… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… James Browning
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Martin Burnicki
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <dra… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… tom petch