[Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard

"Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Wed, 19 February 2020 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2BC120059; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:25:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WI1vgRgRmIu3; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (mx1.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53461120019; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:25:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 029566000048; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:25:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7326000054; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:25:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:25:16 +0100
Message-Id: <5E4D373A020000A1000371AA@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.2.0
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:25:14 +0100
From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: <last-call@ietf.org>,<daniel@lublin.se>, <stenn@nwtime.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@ietf.org>, <ietf-announce@ietf.org>,"ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "ntp-chairs@ietf.org" <ntp-chairs@ietf.org>, <odonoghue@isoc.org>, <suresh@kaloom.com>
References: <158169157632.16127.5189378582509283109.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20200219072347.GA2747553@ot.lublin.se> <10141_1582100906_5E4CF1AA_10141_2470_1_0edc8be5-3887-06a4-8821-041ad65bb027@nwtime.org>
In-Reply-To: <10141_1582100906_5E4CF1AA_10141_2470_1_0edc8be5-3887-06a4-8821-041ad65bb027@nwtime.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/8cnFlDRGsnLA2VM0vLwd22SAqf4>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:25:30 -0000

>>> Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> schrieb am 19.02.2020 um 09:26 in
Nachricht
<10141_1582100906_5E4CF1AA_10141_2470_1_0edc8be5-3887-06a4-8821-041ad65bb027@nwt
me.org>:
> I think a list of implementations is a bad idea.

What about some informational statement like "At the time of writing there
exist <number> implementations having demonstrated use of the protocol in
practice." Any maybe "Those implementations are/were: ..."

> 
> Does the WG really want to deal with the ongoing updates, and the
> liability that will likely exist if the list is incorrect, or it is
> decided that updates will no longer be made?
> 
> H
> 
> On 2/18/2020 11:23 PM, Daniel Lublin wrote:
>> Good day,
>> 
>> I'm not entirely convinced of keeping a list of implementations in an RFC.
>> But since the information is there, let's at least have it corrected and
>> updated upon publishing.
>> 
>> Updated XML for the whole section 8.6. Implementation 6 follows.
>> 
>>   <section title="Implementation 6">
>>     <t>Organization: Hacklunch, independent</t>
>> 
>>     <t>Implementor: Michael Cardell Widerkrantz, Daniel Lublin, Martin 
> Samuelsson et. al.</t>
>> 
>>     <t>Maturity: interoperable client, immature server</t>
>> 
>>     <section title="Coverage">
>>       <t>NTS‑KE client and server.</t>
>>     </section>
>> 
>>     <section title="Licensing">
>>       <t>Licensing is ISC (details in LICENSE file).</t>
>> 
>>       <t>Source code is available at:
>>       https://gitlab.com/hacklunch/ntsclient</t>
>>     </section>
>> 
>>     <section title="Contact Information">
>>       <t>Contact Michael Cardell Widerkrantz: mc@netnod.se</t>
>>     </section>
>> 
>>     <section title="Last Update">
>>       <t>The implementation was updated 6. February 2020.</t>
>>     </section>
>>   </section>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ntp mailing list
>> ntp@ietf.org 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp 
>> 
> 
> ‑‑ 
> Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>
> http://networktimefoundation.org ‑ be a member!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp