[Ntp] NTS-KE port is 4460

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Mon, 08 June 2020 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4343A08FD for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 00:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.036
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pkba_FPzrqlu for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 00:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E2E3A08FB for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 00:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD2040605C; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 00:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: ntp@ietf.org
cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:18:03 -0700
Message-Id: <20200608071803.ADD2040605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/9Q8VHmUTmrAmitF8cWnkLgXpRos>
Subject: [Ntp] NTS-KE port is 4460
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 07:18:06 -0000

<https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port
-numbers.xhtml?search=4460>

The servers at ntp1.glypnod.com and ntp2.glypnod.com are listening on both the 
old and new ports.

When your servers are listening on the new port, please let me/us know and 
I'll contribute some test traffic.

----------

The listen-on-both change is in NTPsec's git head.  There are 2 other code 
changes before a final/clean release.  The first is to change the default port 
number for KE connections.  (We've been using 123.)  The second is to drop 
listening on the old port number.

My plan is to wait a few days or a week before changing the default port 
number.  The idea is to give time for most sites to start listening on the new 
port number.  Then wait another few days or a week before stopping listening 
on port 123.

If the RFC is actually published before all that waiting happens, we'll 
probably make the changes and do a release with tarball.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.