Re: [Ntp] [tsvwg] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port-02

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 08 December 2021 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA573A07AB; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:24:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yTyn9zHOlFm1; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-1.web-hosting.com (server217-1.web-hosting.com [198.54.114.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D58A23A07B7; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:23:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ORxWlv2qI9hqrN2f1i49sv4csmLPrBPQnYpZATJxeDM=; b=JFi7ih0bZtqlHP4hvh9F8ddLxM bDdFfijICBqFG1vUJvXqItlxvlAjjFRR0dh253Vu1qFEYF7/DyFApq5i0NevJjVS1hQCtOpjFXBWV 0gwjcByafVR1uGYv0Qr+wyz8ki28ofoOyGGJlS/lz2lKRtvQpQ5UKwtL+9Pi316SGKGAAX+u7pfiO vfVi+hr0yCZYQbxYwHisB4X+XhQqmGLtQkjqrg58DIqOGk82JmmeRu+xbUhz7+KLhE0BNDJo9t2ct ga5yqBpcx/SjH2NAomhofDKl3eE8dNUwMwPxnA0T2dm8O1E2gWIetJmPTYCnsL3pUt0QBFe96F0kk EDl2Phqw==;
Received: from cpe-172-114-237-88.socal.res.rr.com ([172.114.237.88]:53480 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1mv0fR-001rnt-SY; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 12:23:50 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_98CB9E72-E8F4-471D-9C00-056A99E76859"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <98f35559-b1ff-be8b-d06e-a034ccd4b610@lear.ch>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 09:23:37 -0800
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>, Steven Sommars <stevesommarsntp@gmail.com>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>, Martin Burnicki <martin.burnicki@meinberg.de>, Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>, Joseph Touch via IANA-Port-Experts <iana-port-experts@icann.org>, draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port.all@ietf.org, tsv-art <tsv-art@ietf.org>, Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net>
Message-Id: <EA1F9DA1-6C73-4BA6-9566-BEA09E3C6165@strayalpha.com>
References: <20211204231206.A534228C17A@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net> <A803AF18-2BBD-4A54-9802-3EF693066E6C@strayalpha.com> <CAD4huA7RhF3xZJkdghz4yx3qk8uBjkfJv7Y_hDCvX1a=wATBkg@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VENkyebRf25W6EpW0yZY6ELYS41A4D_i+RnQE1M21P2hg@mail.gmail.com> <Ya3fLJCHUsm1wE28@localhost> <90723c26-0352-a4d1-f765-eb26b1522954@pdmconsulting.net> <bf78924b-69bc-760e-cc7f-e6896504e194@meinberg.de> <Ya81mYy8/EuH8ilY@localhost> <ABF8072B-C6C0-47F3-BD7B-BAFE927B5DE1@strayalpha.com> <d3d167ee-5a6d-0060-a350-6eb04ba0ae8b@lear.ch> <98f35559-b1ff-be8b-d06e-a034ccd4b610@lear.ch>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.20.0.1.32)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/D2k2OkSGFGVZkO-dugcUIirBvnU>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [tsvwg] [Tsv-art] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port-02
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 17:24:03 -0000

Hi, Eliot,

Packets ARE getting to endpoints. 

If the issue is that packets of certain *sizes* aren’t getting there, then NTP should find a way around that using the current port. The fact that the existing port is being filtered is on them. Moving to another port simply invites firewall managers to add that number to their current NTP filters.

Joe

—
Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

> On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:14 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote:
> 
> Just to follow this up, my point is that the version bit doesn't matter if the packets aren't getting to endpoints.  At that point we need to start thinking about what is best for the Internet, and there may well be a tradeoff here.  But it really depends on what the operational data looks like, in so much as we can get at it.
> 
> Eliot