IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Mon, 31 July 2017 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229D6132751 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.089
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.089 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUbv6TWw4fMM for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (psp3.ntp.org [185.140.48.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A3A13276C for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (unknown [127.0.0.235]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9929086DBA7 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:27:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (fortinet.ntp.org [10.224.90.254]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4448686DAB4 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:27:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>) id 1dcFP9-000IR9-Ti for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:27:08 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id t201so187016645wmt.1 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Vc67mt6KZZfAOKlZXZmwLio/5WWLYtdt2r0bmGNhHi4=; b=FkcfSEsP8vVdb7crDtd5+gJYjonknD/u5yS0CnK4W9PQOaPAAlOoxZszES8cl9Bb7j 3BcayxJJqxeENnFAZsL1UrDwpj7aZbx/VgXHOju6TsPT/ERP3kIv8cFx9ZKtaASim/pE bMjWiX8eoDYCkImAmxq+DGmwJ8n2Go/gIpl99z6WKkplUzJEq3wdVz6EyYBY6oIIoGyp CWgMAAHTVl7u/xEAwYCMXUybyRPG8YSUXy+yFGPclh03z5Pc10JXBrEZxYfc6QL2cHDi ig+WUdmzwMXRcWR0p5Q+DV5txpDTiEW/lPWWuHTA2TT79LpBtuAegrCG4GdWP+4bgq+B p0gQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Vc67mt6KZZfAOKlZXZmwLio/5WWLYtdt2r0bmGNhHi4=; b=qRSMZ0Kf5cO87dgKwd3cA76RRhHb5RTBQRZ7HrWZ1JsWduIAO/9voRPUI2BOFAtMuW XpxlWbe9XGFNMGcHtYe9y2vOfCVAerul5+Qs9LmkZ+sBZuPEmZydh7i8a/BzRHlIW/6Y cl2ghc6hvuYbA70QIAr0D0DXafP1IedBAWmwEnTlC0kBOaQzPOp5abpGjdQfTCyX9QNn DPMISIA5xCu01wIsKWP15W1vwBRO87R4wtMcNfLsg9gaFaICjQ8f7HJDyHziFYzqRKaD VVn2EX32odwOX20R7VbDl3yMgPTYRu9MXYPld014scsY7zzXmxdJXMUy++rNaQDU0L/O QlYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113H4P4zlX+kZEjn0wQM4OHuJjYJrK++T5F3fy8/xAF6Bk7fKvwV MxlgJJV1TdVpCNtXUsTan/8VWVIwMBhO
X-Received: by 10.80.150.1 with SMTP id y1mr11036983eda.79.1501525618676; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.157.140 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.80.157.140 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <707deca2-9037-c9fc-69bc-71ee80cb4c97@nwtime.org>
References: <707deca2-9037-c9fc-69bc-71ee80cb4c97@nwtime.org>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:26:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJm83bBjUU_PHhOcH4Sa7LdE2JEN3wojmXTWv_F_nnnRQz61Rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.82.49
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dfoxfranke@gmail.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ntpwg <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8610791629017435705=="
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

On Jul 31, 2017 1:47 PM, "Harlan Stenn" <stenn@nwtime.org> wrote:

Dave Mills recalls seeing a message where it was stated that DTLS is
great for client/server associations, but DTLS was not an
efficient/effective/whatever way to establish a symmetric association.


I recall you asserting this in Prague but I haven't seen said message or
anything else which would substantiate this claim. Do you have details?

_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email