IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-port-randomization-06: (with COMMENT)

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Fri, 04 June 2021 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70B03A2B6B; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 23:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_zZVJffO0NP; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 23:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C3E3A2B6A; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 23:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.133] (unknown [186.19.8.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9167A2809CD; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 06:29:22 +0000 (UTC)
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, fernando.gont@edgeuno.com
Cc: draft-ietf-ntp-port-randomization@ietf.org, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, ntp@ietf.org, odonoghue@isoc.org
References: <162263963650.31656.11270664318727065542@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Message-ID: <1c9803b1-2d2a-e645-0760-add872835b4d@gont.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 03:29:19 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <162263963650.31656.11270664318727065542@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/DgTXFYzhEREsbejF444BgT_yrZg>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-port-randomization-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 06:29:33 -0000

Hello, Zaheduzzaman,

Thanks so much for your comments! -- In-line...

On 2/6/21 10:13, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker wrote:
[....]
> I have two observations,
> 
>      *   it says "This issue has been tracked by US-CERT with VU#597821, and has
>      been
>     assigned CVE-2019-11331." Please provide proper reference to the mentioned
>     terminologies and assignment.

Does this look better:

    This issue has been assigned CVE-2019-11331 [VULN-REPORT].


where:

    [VULN-REPORT]
               The MITRE Corporation, "CVE-2019-11331", April 2019,
               <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-
               2019-11331>.

?



>      *   removal of section 5: I don't think implementation status is a bad idea
>      to be included in the memo. If not in a section, may be as appendix.

Typically, these sections are removed (thereś an RFC on the topic). But 
I wouldn't mind myself to e.g. keep the Implementation Status in an 
Appendix.

Thanks!

Regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email