IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] NTS IANA request

Watson Ladd <watson@cloudflare.com> Wed, 05 June 2019 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <watson@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E831201B5 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 10:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6LP-0JhdVqd for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41DE11200B8 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id i34so5475427qta.6 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vJ/v4b0L2rpI0qxUb+oaD1m4e3I92cZmAb3uFimFkeE=; b=ZpAAKOen580pjzqyj6tThgLbchCZfpsWK2r8qi6Cp9k8fZz1F/zd6DAs8PZ9sLtYqJ lUi5SAIOrmeRgY+zgO9AE+rS44ONWcyIr68PVBoFUZuNi2XW1GwkNNNLKgqcbRnYbtJa LvNc7vHfuozRaPdJre2ekGldRGKmrZhSpmiMM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vJ/v4b0L2rpI0qxUb+oaD1m4e3I92cZmAb3uFimFkeE=; b=nv0B8IGzPBYYsisxE3/5uSMEwNgdR4TFg7Q/vDnBumobm+0ISkzf/iHhYoNrrotLka X6kiNK9AggynGdmWoDh9VFYl4OsS3BDn1MbC7r5rNFpm5A5YpmXx1p7hUmQplikC2eLM S380rsQ3QddNpwZ2389lW9j407yHME14m2faxneZ9PgWUGv0jXx3IT3HPtMT9T/PDiwG d/nEP7w+CMM//2GGWcsecxr5f2ml/0z4q63XR+P/qEyWC3gB/G/hFX58yTa4SuiGS2cM 9NoD5GijHDNd+3JNvoYWhCd+VaVyN2aEHH5XJs+Asx3Oq6LDfRJ7FDOJ9rD2X/CD+Usb nuyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXIsk2FvinacNpOYIJKPbLU9fKgtaQ3zGKRqGP0I86zAhrdD3WO opUlYqaT8jX2GZHsE67rpThSuu5KSmW9S+aJlwbDAq67KnE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxaT3WV9Nd7UUzjmwoYJFIiIOoKs380GHg5n2Fkl7nmDECE2jY/Ft59EgPBpxlGwB3eiAc/fiPJ+6AlJgK2XG8=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3637:: with SMTP id m52mr22223911qtb.238.1559755162004; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 10:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Watson Ladd <watson@cloudflare.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 10:19:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAN2QdAH9Uh_wYSEizgYTjd4Q6VFQT+tvH8dnbPgKKc59+vEfng@mail.gmail.com>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/FgcvC7n8LN4aAwHwNZRZNkvP3z0>
Subject: [Ntp] NTS IANA request
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 17:19:25 -0000

Dear all,

Port 1009 is unassigned, and happens to be the time displayed on
watches in advertisements. No reason we couldn't continue old
tradition of using significant port numbers and use it for NTS.

We could also use 123 tcp which is assigned to NTP but not used.

Sincerely,
Watson Ladd

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email