IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] FW: Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries-03.txt>

Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net> Mon, 18 April 2022 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <halmurray@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778933A126E; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VkZBtncVh08J; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B3823A126D; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.137.68.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 23IHe1w8007224 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:40:01 -0700
Received: from hgm (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3859028C1CA; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7.1
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: ntp@ietf.org, Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net>
From: Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> of "Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:50:59 -0000." <35D6C344-2B09-43B8-9482-58ADDDF82EE1@akamai.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:40:01 -0700
Message-Id: <20220418174001.3859028C1CA@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbz0UnGVrg3vzkconG19BT0Bv0rsyE1qpOfhUYrWeZymdNqTQtZlyKd2LjSuoVR2l35klkfhkjWxOHpClmX3RPzqIauexS4njc=
X-Sonic-ID: C;QgXfkj6/7BG+J6sBQWJIoQ== M;ImgPkz6/7BG+J6sBQWJIoQ==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: -1.5/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/FjbHp9pxp39ia2j9u1eOwKMfZBk>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] FW: Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries-03.txt>
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:40:09 -0000

>>    But this draft doesn't make any changes to 7821's entry. So why
>>     include 7821 but not 8915 (I don't think either one should be
>>     included)? 
> Shrug.  If the WG wants a change during this greatly extended WGLC phase, fine with me.

Could there be a special special section that indicates that other RFCs are 
related but not changed?


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email