Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 17 February 2020 13:23 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100B21200FB for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 05:23:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3_HgpK1k_CS for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 05:22:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C1E1200E5 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 05:22:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9659D300B3D for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:56:14 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id T8dSsHKPW9MS for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:56:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from client-141-23-186-148.wlan.tu-berlin.de (client-141-23-186-148.wlan.tu-berlin.de [141.23.186.148]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D080D3005D5; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:56:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <D33A88BA-65E1-4529-9825-B943F7AE5976@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EFF86335-F26C-4024-935D-2ABDC3D21309"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:22:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <158169157632.16127.5189378582509283109.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: ntp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@ietf.org, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org
References: <158169157632.16127.5189378582509283109.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/GWYCugsABHYszPd4BdKxakSK3Ng>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 05:28:15 -0800
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:23:02 -0000
Section 3 says: "... NTS-KE server's private certificate." Certificates are public. I assume that you are talking about a private key here. Section 4.1.5 says: "... denoting Numeric Identifiers from the IANA AEAD registry [RFC5116]". I think it would be more useful to provide a pointer to the registry instead of the RFC that created the registry. Section 4.1.7 says: "...an IPv4 address in dotted decimal notation, an IPv6 address, or ...". This is followed by a sentence on the format of the IPv6 address and s sentence on IDNs. I think a parallel structure would be more clear. Please list the choices, and then discuss the format used for each of the choices. Section 7.1: I believe the contact should be iesg@ietf.org <mailto:iesg@ietf.org> (not chair@ietf.org <mailto:chair@ietf.org>). Russ > On Feb 14, 2020, at 9:46 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from the Network Time Protocol WG (ntp) to > consider the following document: - 'Network Time Security for the Network > Time Protocol' > <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2020-02-28. Exceptionally, comments may > be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This memo specifies Network Time Security (NTS), a mechanism for > using Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Authenticated Encryption > with Associated Data (AEAD) to provide cryptographic security for the > client-server mode of the Network Time Protocol (NTP). > > NTS is structured as a suite of two loosely coupled sub-protocols. > The first (NTS-KE) handles initial authentication and key > establishment over TLS. The second handles encryption and > authentication during NTP time synchronization via extension fields > in the NTP packets, and holds all required state only on the client > via opaque cookies. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > The document contains these normative downward references. > See RFC 3967 for additional information: > rfc5297: Synthetic Initialization Vector (SIV) Authenticated Encryption Using the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) (Informational - IETF stream) > > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
- [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-nt… The IESG
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Russ Housley
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Marcus Dansarie
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Daniel Lublin
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Russ Housley
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Franke, Daniel
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] NTP Extensions (was Re: Las… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Daniel Franke
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Daniel Franke
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: [Ntp] NTP Extensions (was Re: Last Call: <dra… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Steven Sommars
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-fo… Miroslav Lichvar
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-… Ulrich Windl