Re: [Ntp] Leap second draft

"Dieter Sibold" <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 30 March 2019 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A0A120116 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 03:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RsDFgnmQtP6P for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 03:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A952F120026 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 03:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 4so5017325wmf.1 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 03:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=+ynIuTzntDOfc9LUSZLX9v1IuiZtPtwYkPeyYE6qnlk=; b=Sss0DaFSVW1dbBujiJGinoBFahsVHvS0/2MkZx0sFZnfl1LhwA7ekwvTgbATgeeFz2 hVkXv2CtYYWJYH/Z6PVGjRLb0kAB6cM8qbYwLCjmwUEwUnI75uQjvtdT5YgqrP0iLGa3 72eNjDSF+aJa55WSFxzcMppnTior4GuFj4yK84pcMG5hiyMSJ2QYdXKbZ5tjFc1ZxA+M unNJftAE5gRKvtfXHz7oe3CZS7cbGp+ByrlfGgooy5i+96TPJTz3NvRlDazA072cl0au 9vwlFBVYa982VlZs6UbU+1wjO5KtL8I+PEJ0rpyODa2bR8ndXUKsTI6abYnJVIRzPVNM LOfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=+ynIuTzntDOfc9LUSZLX9v1IuiZtPtwYkPeyYE6qnlk=; b=C2Xp2sTSvtLTpjUbFvf+AOxqhbz/QFRk92EhuZd/5NGOWVHAWps/SY02kEi0hFgAd6 8GnK/DmLBH0tUyd7rEnJVNZRNLS87sqhtL4ed/GG2wqzOUIzhtVvgp9jzmgBfC0Hap35 dlm8+cUb+eN5wqsnKey28d9lm6xCt3Qg3er8vWi54Rkk6se0GGDJtR/Tm3fDMUm+DtvH VP+wQT1QW268Jr/OMF0x5LLpIFZshGMPLwDN+7NmnYrQaegPCJPqu/SAhI91J34uO6UL NkN9PhZGmtUPoWfoPHfUpVzaZxzSRHGzkciybhGihDPP/ttf8uF/fC0AVcSv7vh0bCR0 FAcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUT3PmnA1kK7LSE48vZBUOVrtlkrO6YQHRYUEL5XK+o089DCOhb GUItAU3o3oN3uvD65gbHNxU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmLG2ZTXmBydiOs1+9YB21TwOR6AyNR9nxAD/RxHKJZY1h1UUaR4YuWIY9GxI543HjXhy42w==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:720a:: with SMTP id n10mr6212268wmc.107.1553941317258; Sat, 30 Mar 2019 03:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (p2E5008D0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [46.80.8.208]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u19sm6742331wmc.7.2019.03.30.03.21.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 30 Mar 2019 03:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Cc: ntp@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:21:55 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5594)
Message-ID: <EB354533-51FE-4ED3-B55E-25A9DC7022CF@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bCbVzO3NNCbjTy+O_16T7DBeA7O6018WWGu_-GyuN-8UA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJm83bD5Ozkpg5TpkogOW6xeeNQL3ZziLO9URM7haqN8Wrp=Wg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bCbVzO3NNCbjTy+O_16T7DBeA7O6018WWGu_-GyuN-8UA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/Ghv_XQ6xwLeTRj7jSVpvoAM1Mz8>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Leap second draft
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 10:22:01 -0000

Just a short note. At 1972-01-01 the difference between TAI and UTC was 
10s. You might introduce the link to
https://hpiers.obspm.fr/eoppc/bul/bulc/UTC-TAI.history

- Dieter

Dieter Sibold
dsibold.ietf@gmail.com

On 29 Mar 2019, at 20:57, Daniel Franke wrote:

> I screwed up the datatracker submission by typoing my email address,
> but here (attached) is draft 00 while I'm waiting for the secretariat
> to get the submission unstuck.
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 5:46 PM Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm writing up an I-D clarifying how NTP implementations are to 
>> behave
>> in proximity to a leap second and also introducing an extension field
>> that provides better leap-second-related information than is
>> expressible using header fields alone, including giving the TAI-UTC
>> offset.
>>
>> Karen, you mentioned a possible CfA for
>> draft-stenn-ntp-extended-information if Harlan revises it to comply
>> with RFC 7822 (-04 does not appear to comply). Our two drafts are
>> partly redundant in purpose since they both provide TAI-UTC offset 
>> and
>> we won't want to adopt both. Of course I think mine is the one we
>> should adopt, but I'll strive to get a -00 submitted promptly so that
>> they can be considered side-by-side without unduly delaying Harlan's
>> CfA.
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp