IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] [EXT] Re: Alternative for interleave mode

Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Fri, 13 January 2023 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F96C152716 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 10:14:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BVZy-9-vIzYr for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 10:14:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (mx2.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485BFC1526FF for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 10:14:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B4336000053 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:13:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp2.uni-regensburg.de (smtp2.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.uni-regensburg.de", Issuer "GEANT OV RSA CA 4" (verified OK)) by mx2.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BD7600004D for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:13:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:13:57 +0100
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Reply-To: Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de
To: ntp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <69c9b7c2-5e91-4530-a0da-8721371b68b2@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR02MB576597D2A95318CA92AD270CCFC29@AM7PR02MB5765.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAPz_-SWfJgxtaTYjEyck106oCezMV6P+psV=Ldes4MRJ5uNjFQ@mail.gmail.com> <AM7PR02MB576597D2A95318CA92AD270CCFC29@AM7PR02MB5765.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Correlation-ID: <69c9b7c2-5e91-4530-a0da-8721371b68b2@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/Gtb4rCjN5CQyOm7wSwANjtvXYEk>
Subject: [Ntp] [EXT] Re: Alternative for interleave mode
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:14:03 -0000

Actually I had the same idea when reading the proposal.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email