[Ntp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt
Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 July 2024 19:16 UTC
Return-Path: <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0879BC151086; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b0VQ6Kkp9HTI; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28CB7C14F69D; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ef2d96164aso17244791fa.3; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1722021368; x=1722626168; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IYg66Ki2XHqI3jopO6jRrWx/pi2cViQGSkcSPk6dTHU=; b=lpdYWa9rwNsFkPDgeR26GB1hEQ6ms/nbHmMOq+2h7DKk1yyE2Oo6wzp9GTqufoFvqG jys7d5SEH2iZIl6HzKQ39HbwdVYHnjXhSuB0ot1DYkivug2jTuxs0JGZCJGTcgPkVsuG YWXqkhfbLz7gG2cakmYGi37zP5MmdBUhwNNB0tF9ORn76/o+Nnq2qYSf+ygqa1il2Yf2 xvhJshLwOpN7aPfEmcF/vdsOgrJ2/AVB4igAGrGhuLwNb7rtLJDWRFESfiHwMfJn0nrp j98aSAg/VVwYEVJVqLV6f4pBTBH6hXkKnLtycL+H2+r4HWeScymzWOyD8n3MzxMb9RIU FZcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722021368; x=1722626168; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=IYg66Ki2XHqI3jopO6jRrWx/pi2cViQGSkcSPk6dTHU=; b=wsYBUYvYdHO5KsoQCevgZuPhyuOrjKvzPFbe9oAIlOUHDkzRKmEv2H8/uY8+3V2b+F H4GXQEDFTiBzxoxAqrTx/8MOfcz2eBaKbbIbbUhg3gfB2awWArH15BHa8iCY4j8D14fQ vqif72QQz6Pto3ZFfdTFI91vAL54cLR8dX+ZBzetHnq2SFdbMk/qFemwtk3P4qUICeEz Dd7GqKLaUXRL7vSlccIpt8a7PZqdn8ZrryKyD3UsUy3oxWyQw93lbTj660dXvI5/M+UK 7addhz0g5o45SCDK/K5/OiErgiR41lKR6sZtKhlDCs5rwi3zwSvZAbq07kCizMFT05Nl MtrQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVQkgypsb8WLyiYJJEzr8DoILLZdxw+GduvWgvkZF00fRlUyrg+/RXxTNLOxPQStrLq0+c=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwwlD1DJrtEY6lbmOTOKE60AixEQ1LN6zZY6o1CDYQXGeFMm6pu r2IhuCrR/bsh7RPcbYBiwJvZn18/fKGekQ+R8ePEMGRavvQpwvxFo84+dgLrkZJb1TfxZCuj3uX syzELwOfz+OXxgDJ0BtAFyfLtUXk0RjyoXBc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHxX6BtuTIUPBI0+qZBddeEzbZsddajAd042FKy/5FogKA+4aISeElfHmIQLGfF+M7rLUKgWLHHRlPKmX2QZ9o=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:700c:0:b0:2ef:2dc7:a8f6 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f12edfd3cfmr3955621fa.13.1722021367866; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171880149775.17275.17603202157290281888@ietfa.amsl.com> <AM7PR02MB576576740392B0B63189B4EFCFD42@AM7PR02MB5765.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR02MB576576740392B0B63189B4EFCFD42@AM7PR02MB5765.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:15:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKtkH6yn4X1Eo8Mh1LY0zC9doX_Yxh8Aw=7iPHDxg1p=K0dERA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Arnold <doug.arnold=40meinberg-usa.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ed6ec0061e2b5718"
Message-ID-Hash: CPHU6WUUVGT24PXJOT7ZHKXTZ75PP6LJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: CPHU6WUUVGT24PXJOT7ZHKXTZ75PP6LJ
X-MailFrom: dsibold.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ntp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Ntp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/IBIGD4UfZmo9AJZNT4WARvJ3AYw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ntp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ntp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ntp-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Miroslav, thanks for this well written document. Working group chair's hat off: I have a question regarding the header fields LI and Flags. According to the draft: - LI=3 signals to the client that the server is not synchronised - Flag=1 signals to the client that the server does not have a source of time which provides leap information (unknown leap) I'm wondering why the information about the unknown leap is transmitted by the field Flags and not bei the field LI? Would it not make sense that all leap seconds related information is transmitted by the Leap Indicator field LI? Could the meaning of LI=3 and Flag=1 be swapped? Or are there technical reasons against this? - Dieter Am Di., 25. Juni 2024 um 00:57 Uhr schrieb Doug Arnold <doug.arnold= 40meinberg-usa.com@dmarc.ietf.org>: > The corrections and additions to ntpv5 in this draft all look like > improvements to me. > ------------------------------ > *From:* internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 19, 2024 8:51 AM > *To:* i-d-announce@ietf.org <i-d-announce@ietf.org> > *Cc:* ntp@ietf.org <ntp@ietf.org> > *Subject:* [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt > > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt is now available. It is a work > item > of the Network Time Protocols (NTP) WG of the IETF. > > Title: Network Time Protocol Version 5 > Author: Miroslav Lichvar > Name: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt > Pages: 31 > Dates: 2024-06-19 > > Abstract: > > This document describes the version 5 of the Network Time Protocol > (NTP). > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5/ > > There is also an HTMLized version available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02 > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > ntp mailing list -- ntp@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ntp-leave@ietf.org > _______________________________________________ > ntp mailing list -- ntp@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ntp-leave@ietf.org >
- [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt internet-drafts
- [Ntp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt Doug Arnold
- [Ntp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt Dieter Sibold
- [Ntp] Re: [EXT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-nt… Windl, Ulrich
- [Ntp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt Miroslav Lichvar
- [Ntp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt Tamme Dittrich
- [Ntp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-02.txt David Venhoek