Re: [Ntp] Calls for Adoption -- NTP Extension Field drafts -- Four separate drafts

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880B112088F for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 04:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h6Qzj_N9vnMr for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 04:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDFB812088C for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 04:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.8.100] (unknown [178.243.177.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C80986219; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:57:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <1B4A56E7-16A6-4767-9268-BCF4BEB9A247@isoc.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <4550dae9-d9ae-2395-a315-ddbae74aed0e@si6networks.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:40:26 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1B4A56E7-16A6-4767-9268-BCF4BEB9A247@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/ITSnJvt13o6-E8Fl2jcGoRT7vnY>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Calls for Adoption -- NTP Extension Field drafts -- Four separate drafts
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:57:07 -0000

Hello, Karen,

I support the adoption of all four documents.

I will provide review for each of them.

Thanks,
Fernando




On 28/8/19 06:37, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> The following four drafts are four different proposals for new extension fields. Please review each draft and indicate whether these should be adopted by the working group. I am sending them all as one set because they are all extension fields, but we need a response for each draft listed below. 
> 
> Thanks!
> Karen and Dieter
> 
> 1.  Network Time Protocol Extended Information Extension Field
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-extended-information/
> 
> 2.  Network Time Protocol I-Do Extension Field
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-i-do/
> 
> 3.  Network Time Protocol MAC/Last Extension Fields
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-mac-last-ef/
> 
> 4.  Network Time Protocol Suggested REFID Extension Field
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-suggest-refid/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
> .
> 


-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492