Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-06.txt

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 28 June 2019 06:07 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156154491366.20087.10525017842665990919@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACsn0c=D2Z6phAh4mzeAZqkLxMenOPpgShOOmnovj7q7-n5wiA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=D2Z6phAh4mzeAZqkLxMenOPpgShOOmnovj7q7-n5wiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:37:06 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn66tZBrZ3utORgRtgsvzitUujfXE=MnKPDs1A_vNh8C5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/J1njNot_ZQRPvYyqkTMe_jcffak>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-06.txt
Precedence: list

Hi Watson,

Thanks for looking into this. I have made the update and posted a new
version handling this.

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-06&url2=draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-07

Authors believe it is better to handle NTS in another draft and
keeping the scope of this I-D limited.

Thanks!
Dhruv


On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 2:41 AM Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Forgive me for only now taking a look at this, but the security
> considerations section seems to be omitting the authentication subtree
> from the sensitive list on read, talking only about writing it. But an
> attacker with read access will get the keys, and that would be bad.
>
> Also is it too late/too early to include NTS?
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

[Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-… internet-drafts
Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Watson Ladd
Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-mo… Dhruv Dhody