Re: [Ntp] Internal server error code in NTS-KE

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Thu, 05 December 2019 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684FF120074 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:11:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qoGSKnNQrjq9 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:11:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F27C512002F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id p8so4105188iln.12 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:11:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=D5NCsKn9zoff84hHFewi03Ve+M/WJUFNiXs7ipAENbU=; b=J7i7tL8UosddeiokHuHstMWNqIohGfmYtJaY/vLhFAPTIDclQoUSJu91cPhVOqjc3q GBR+UPpTtjPk/BtzSe5pauubM8byixvD+d9GLkKk4W68AGMbDU6EKiZvp0HJQGhZ5Hws TLUmyj+CPnvunvb+PgE13SHCKkCoAISkmMWZmjG+2pqnHHBokpAx0GAarWLM8WQFvEoH +aNDlLTbX8mOsz7qn+ATti0BevxVOIj+gB3V5DezthbqsAC5nra810ombL0xL2l5CxnK 1HUGRwFJmIAJH/JPyh5ThXO35wmHsMoaVq8rSgvwRLTIb2CMVfKApsCVSh3UPEq9yA6u qN7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D5NCsKn9zoff84hHFewi03Ve+M/WJUFNiXs7ipAENbU=; b=OO4l11mXOhyww5eCjA7iNU98DNEg1ZzNE+nEsjvKGTSRGYwr4mJzOyFXc699GCENkB yeXLLSFq+tCyeJ3qD9muVvObGuUz13XjXadzSYwkpcPn/27MjrKkg4mTsd6vU+orRg0X z4rYDhaqKP9QtNUZorEWk4va8cWKS+DA0mC9uhBqERB4rYzrbYRufz+jjDcAVJGY8O5y lJc5M8VTR4/UJbHmBlHkivAguZB/eWiSqDb4mf0uWMQGpYd9qTAjE4XOAEnGO/Wx6QBq YnhGY5qBPluvpK1JwORnpl82B5En1gEbUCXvda0+v+zVvLDl7cU03NyjUwCoXxCzFIeJ TX5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWW9AqC0lvmoCVRya5PR6eTeLpzK78huSWS9iIdz192R1gYpFDl 5ACR4I2Or8x8WecIhf8I7meo3ek60238OIf1ert15A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwd+eSDyNmjFj9X300vC3enyXNFad/XF/JSEORIiI1y+yDA+zxfVuQ3kP26A8tLDpbkYeMvkGxa1Xv1JRy1Xe4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:45d2:: with SMTP id z79mr10677055ilj.76.1575576716204; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:11:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN2QdAHQ=b0cHTR_3G9f3ji41YC6w8mOD3oWiZ+yhf1_2B4QEQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN2QdAHQ=b0cHTR_3G9f3ji41YC6w8mOD3oWiZ+yhf1_2B4QEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:11:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJm83bB7TwfK5YcXpXg_usvxtZLx1wiyyQ0wh603mVJu5WLM2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watson=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/K9gZ0C9eVjKuyPaGZ_xrB-88N1E>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Internal server error code in NTS-KE
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 20:11:58 -0000

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 2:58 PM Watson Ladd
<watson=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> I've just realized I'd like to send an error record in NTS-KE for a
> temporary inability of the server to answer a request. There is no
> error code allocated for this yet, so I'm going with 0xff, 0xff. On
> that note should we have an experimental range for these codepoints?

32768-65535 is already reserved for private & experimental use, so
0xffff is fine. Not a bad idea to have a standard codepoint for this
though.