[Ntp] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 28 June 2021 10:15 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FA43A33F3; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 03:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model@ietf.org, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, ntp@ietf.org, Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>, dsibold.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.33.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <162487532349.11022.9807815396693642606@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 03:15:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/KD-6GGF8I4Mo5apMQtW9i0C8Tcc>
Subject: [Ntp] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:15:24 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-15: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. Special thanks for Dieter Sibold as the document shepherd write-up includes text about the WG consensus. Please find below one blocking DISCUSS point (but really trivial and easy to address), some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated), and some nits. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric -- Section 13.1 -- As RFC 7317 is imported by the YANG module, it must be a normative reference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Should the NTP version(s) be mentioned in the abstract ? -- Section 1 -- The text appears to indicate that the associations can be configured while the tree diagram indicateds tha associations are read-only. Should the associations text moved to the section 1.1 (i.e., operational states) ? -- Section 1.5 -- Using a table for listing references is unusual. Is there a reason why this form is used ? -- Section 8 -- Should there be more constraints on "ntp-version" ? I.e., a minimum of 3 ?
- [Ntp] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp-yan… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [Ntp] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Ntp] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ntp… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)