Re: [Ntp] WGLC - draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-requirements

kristof.teichel@ptb.de Tue, 12 December 2023 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <kristof.teichel@ptb.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570D2C14F748 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:49:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ptb.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1v49Ny0pCQ5 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.bs.ptb.de (mx1.bs.ptb.de [192.53.103.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132EBC008A64 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:49:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from s23397.bs.ptb.de ([172.21.101.132]) by mx1.bs.ptb.de with ESMTP id 3BCEni43012646-3BCEni45012646 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:49:45 +0100
In-Reply-To: <0D84CEB4-640F-492C-ADAE-05C4A6E856D6@gmail.com>
References: <CA+mgmiMFLDRggrBUzdJyjhgbM6q0m8nY8PUoU5oxbR2HtZh51A@mail.gmail.com> <OF33DB0AFF.1649DFBE-ONC1258A83.002F27E4-C1258A83.0049F82B@ptb.de> <0D84CEB4-640F-492C-ADAE-05C4A6E856D6@gmail.com>
To: James <james.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: ntp@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: kristof.teichel@ptb.de
Message-ID: <OF35346BF9.4F5F88ED-ONC1258A83.0050A8D3-C1258A83.005174AD@ptb.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:49:42 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005174ACC1258A83_="
X-FEAS-Client-IP: 172.21.101.132
X-FE-Policy-ID: 5:5:5:SYSTEM
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=ptb.de; s=s1-ptbde; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=references:to:cc:mime-version:subject:from:message-id:date:content-type; bh=UUqjCo/24Cz9CnyqUmVNXBOhL7Hr1nLVCED5iuM7Ibk=; b=T73oN0ojiHZwhXqEZ6dE9IOFMk5kdiSXtSDW1wneF87GuVzYcAAKm5lhH7AUQgK8h2eHPyUflMWP Z2Ee1eQ7vDGBYmRcK9K0lRZMGcwkoawV0xj2r3W5AH2VxIo3Jel6mQY4PJYE44Q41H5kwxp0auiQ GTFPZf+uHjUsnAbVyzAttMO85r+z0uKRnuuUlBI3sueye1WEGxVu5njreDtfijn1fGbWy+LZhghv bdyhIkb1YDUDH7JeumKgWk+2rOhMNRtx6iwmgOo/FPDp0kObEgJ+tjxC1pb3ZqZGOnbkynZkRvk1 V5qO/4/rZsS/Kg3MBqKoubLydZGR4r7eKOramw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/LAhdF9bleIiHT_1Esk-lxX3CknQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] WGLC - draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-requirements
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 14:49:54 -0000

Hello James,

I'm sorry, I think I really was being unclear:
At least most points would have to be adressed first for us to support 
advancement to IESG.
I was just trying to express that we fundamentally agree with the effort 
and want a document based on this version to go forward.


Besten Gruß / Kind regards,
Kristof Teichel

__________________________________________

Dr.-Ing. Kurt Kristof Teichel
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) 
Arbeitsgruppe 4.42 "Zeitübertragung"
Bundesallee 100
38116 Braunschweig (Germany)
Tel.:        +49 (531) 592-4471
E-Mail:   kristof.teichel@ptb.de
__________________________________________



Von:    "James" <james.ietf@gmail.com>
An:     kristof.teichel@ptb.de
Kopie:  ntp@ietf.org, "Karen ODonoghue" <kodonog@pobox.com>, 
dieter.sibold@ptb.de
Datum:  12.12.2023 15:08
Betreff:        Re: [Ntp] WGLC - draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv5-requirements
Gesendet von:   "ntp" <ntp-bounces@ietf.org>



Kristof and Martin,

Thanks for your review. I'll provide responses to the points you've raised 
in a separate mail, however there's one point of clarification I think 
needs to be addressed first:

> On 12 Dec 2023, at 14:27, kristof.teichel@ptb.de wrote:
> 
> To be clear: we want an adapted document to advance and to be submitted 
to the IESG (not to hold up the process or anything).

I'm sorry but this statement is unclear to me given the current state of 
the process.

Do you believe version -03 as it stands is ready to be submitted to the 
IESG, or do you think any or all of the points you've raised must be 
addressed in order for submission to the IESG?

- J
_______________________________________________
ntp mailing list
ntp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp