From nobody Fri Dec 10 08:01:43 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2EF3A0332 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.847 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MqmLHTQRV_mk for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2739C3A0147 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2f.google.com with SMTP id d10so22502473ybn.0 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=v49CY0XLapt/3VX2RIZQy2XVm0VnEwln7DnGIrlahTo=; b=IhkRXKUUz19knuzVLQCUBfjb/xrSMYKWzA3GQAHTBLreD3haRgsF/wx6DsrDFGRy/L WvCjbw3OinrpxKZ7Qwmr8NqqBFhsHWAH5tKzGcWP+7+3+jYRfVT8H4vZjDJC7zvCFUMe kI24/pP1XBWIqcTMUObzBDt4DVU02xkY0pmr0K37ZvIhWWwKQ0WNjQbBuWC34tbv887i i3WLb1rp2IBa6pPmG29hQodHkho5CXR6/wFdT6yMNTgJ9dSnEk/K7VEdin2C4JXqsL0M LF7iWAvD6nnJ4Ywitwmtv8cX+2YvqNTCo43kj9bLBTzi/XCjUvCGdHO7Zrae+BavaCMH tZ7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=v49CY0XLapt/3VX2RIZQy2XVm0VnEwln7DnGIrlahTo=; b=Vjy4LNfLulNb3OZsTmlUxy+qJomyrxJ1ukT24UpxH3LIvuvb6cfwZlofYK7aD1LIvH ndXg3LyXbVk3zQNwuEKbaXsDDBvpo2MyA/KBSMDCzq0RBIXfBqDPjx8tDyrvs9S1zWOP omIAtZilsB/MYgE6xEcebAwfA3Q7WwBrhbEeXythBtGuiPN8bDUf0Bu0NMgz30ACgwK/ 2A4uSHMVdV9gy71KbUt+xvemlkYXBzjH8h78GcaY/NYhSIqxTL5YdHKa1Q9QPzy9lDf2 BVuymxx9T0pucq66cLaYUgg7XOWjxsQTPBaiiJsf6RUX9NCWdiDWsyw8uCTqpI5XUWNi 4Xhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mrB+dGd3RpJTE0CnDfyc9e0w7vCw1pfAgsLTiEBbWHjilsu+p 3UDJMfZozTA8QAegX6p/bdbFMRdvQGHcg/ckTW6K6ZU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyVTQKH7MlKE8UscRJS0TPMAd6FIGGwgN6mcGy4LKPfN/b6V6QKWJSfKzq0BbanPzu32dLdIJYzjBkBHfdp/I= X-Received: by 2002:a25:db8e:: with SMTP id g136mr14706438ybf.301.1639152095641; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:01:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211209215746.5385B28C1BF@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <20211209215746.5385B28C1BF@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net> From: James Browning Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:00:00 -0800 Message-ID: To: NTP WG Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064c5c305d2ccd69f" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Ntp] Shorter NTS packets? X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Network Time Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 16:01:42 -0000 --00000000000064c5c305d2ccd69f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 1:57 PM Hal Murray wrote: > How much of the problem will shorter packets solve? > > NTS-KE includes a port number. Can each server just pick > a local port? > I would jokingly suggest udp port 4460, at least until the PHBs have it hard blocked. > --00000000000064c5c305d2ccd69f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 1:57 PM Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net> wrote:
How much of the problem will shorter packets solve?
NTS-KE includes a port number.=C2=A0 Can each server just pick
a local port?

I would jokingly suggest udp port 4460, at least until the PHB= s have it hard blocked.
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
--00000000000064c5c305d2ccd69f--