IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 19 February 2020 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E7B12010F; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:31:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hu0IBy0i3OMc; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:31:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC71F120026; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 07:31:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01JFMm5K018214; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:31:27 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=6lyaQdN+teTKpTNxfDJ0FOCMlHaVWKK7O75rlmvqCvw=; b=XR340JBWsTPFu9+oe3J436OtCIOyHF6ikSc2uJ65t2mZzOH/xiIvS3xz5GN8LX020ZZt MBBB0quwa5oDUXMxk5mdJCqzOB53JicnpN5TZ+4qEnVlT6mADAqalsCtlhhj+XtILAOx 3ucb3nV54Cz3+qU20pSNZS6lAQ9N3oamPD83VJB3o1AT80NZgdcyvhnz40U75EJaz9zQ u+1hj4EYwAUllYX1dE2i1gAruW2R5rIXWr2ouYC0gRZ0IymgOXV1EtBPrVGoBrZFNzWR JqXO8CN4ohoEef7E983blSgv9OeYDLdDGheeLuSq4HvUBmTirRXMI+8JFwMvpNiW3lfR hg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2y6962hc5h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:31:27 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 01JFITLq024620; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:31:26 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2y6cuy34v8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:31:26 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:31:25 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:31:25 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
CC: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@ietf.org>, "ntp-chairs@ietf.org" <ntp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHV40XEIaANHNLDW0aX052K0UXraKgieFKAgAARk4CAACLagA==
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:31:25 +0000
Message-ID: <1014050E-BFC4-4A02-B956-EEBDC5BB1055@akamai.com>
References: <158169157632.16127.5189378582509283109.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20200219072347.GA2747553@ot.lublin.se> <0edc8be5-3887-06a4-8821-041ad65bb027@nwtime.org>
In-Reply-To: <0edc8be5-3887-06a4-8821-041ad65bb027@nwtime.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.114.104]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E3506C8237E064499B575BE40FDA3628@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-02-19_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=927 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002050000 definitions=main-2002190117
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-19_03:2020-02-19, 2020-02-19 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=910 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002190117
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/MNi1Q7DFeQZiIXyO6feLqbCA4LQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-22.txt> (Network Time Security for the Network Time Protocol) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:31:30 -0000

>    I think a list of implementations is a bad idea.
    
I could not agree more!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email