IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Should NTPv5 have QUIC bindings?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 21 October 2021 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496133A0045 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzyqv9Gn2ObU for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB19A3A003C for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19LF5xoE027820 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:45:46 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=TjL+RJCvi0Kin0ZbT6AJ3rvCnLYoX54U6kQRD4ts4/k=; b=C+ssE33f6kMf/iMztscobOrsUdLTNIiy8tCcy5xUs0IN4NjNE7IXGzgZo26lAnLXuVPM Lob7chj6Plcu1XmA3gGAA/QaQeNp6qS2Ic6rtCpr9N7YrarpCjhSxf71gCBlPws5lXGZ Ww0SZXPM13LMxRAcUCp5AlBexTuR3IHxCa8UzApX5JihAq0ZHHCh7uoCB2riuZ0T8wPW /f74pMt+leJsigt8S28sXndP+DiRgY6HMmWGC06xdJEr+fM3il+6IKJVuuU5y5DShAGD 3+Q+9JLMG0lsQvZtXJTpf3K/Vg4s2oIzpBjEz6Rvcrb6Wv6nrQ0KjgcTPfyc18CmMBI/ 1A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3btuypva23-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 16:45:45 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19LFYErj023242 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:45 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3bt07yktma-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:45 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:44 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.023; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:45:44 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Should NTPv5 have QUIC bindings?
Thread-Index: AQHXxpK1EPTEzC2WokKyeU6FPwWfxQ==
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:45:43 +0000
Message-ID: <47298AF4-02EB-4955-930E-F74822943D82@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.54.21101001
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_47298AF402EB4955930EF74822943D82akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-10-21_04:2021-10-21, 2021-10-21 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=497 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110210080
X-Proofpoint-GUID: K8MMtlZrFmpenB_6RQutnTCfbQo01v1z
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: K8MMtlZrFmpenB_6RQutnTCfbQo01v1z
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-21_04,2021-10-21_02,2020-04-07_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=443 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110210080
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/Np-nB0XRs6Y98AzzuvV8xfT4NBc>
Subject: [Ntp] Should NTPv5 have QUIC bindings?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:45:53 -0000

Curious to hear what people think.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email