Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security-12.txt and draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-03.txt
dieter.sibold@ptb.de Wed, 23 December 2015 08:19 UTC
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3421ACDB1 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:19:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4l-N2viqNINO for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:19:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCC91ACDA7 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:19:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D20986DB2A for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:19:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB8586DAB7; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.bs.ptb.de ([192.53.103.120]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <dieter.sibold@ptb.de>) id 1aBeV4-0008pb-KO; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:10:31 +0000
Received: from smtp-hub.bs.ptb.de (smtpint01.bs.ptb.de [141.25.87.32]) by mx1.bs.ptb.de with ESMTP id tBN8AJpl008503-tBN8AJpn008503 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:10:19 +0100
Received: from rose.bs.ptb.de (rose.bs.ptb.de [141.25.85.201]) by smtp-hub.bs.ptb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A9DEDAF; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:10:19 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <56799A3E.3020506@ntp.org>
References: <56785CE5.6080102@ntp.org> <OFDECED69B.3FA71F92-ONC1257F22.0063AA4C-C1257F22.006401FE@ptb.de> <OF3D6DD6FA.812C6BCC-ONC1257F22.00775A28-C1257F22.00775A29@ptb.de> <567877FB.7030608@ntp.org> <OF0AC1CCBA.2E240196-ONC1257F23.00313FBA-C1257F23.0033AC80@ptb.de> <5679639D.4010906@nwtime.org> <56799A3E.3020506@ntp.org>
To: mayer@ntp.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <OFB626AB50.8283A0AC-ONC1257F24.002B274D-C1257F24.002CE30C@ptb.de>
From: dieter.sibold@ptb.de
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:10:17 +0100
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.53.103.120
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: mayer@ntp.org, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dieter.sibold@ptb.de
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security-12.txt and draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6206724507529848276=="
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
Danny, I understand your point. Yes the MAC extension field in 6.1.4.3 has to be described more clearly. But why should we need a special draft for a MAC extension field. There is already the draft "draft-ietf-ntp-extension-field" which should me general enough for additional new extension fields. "ntpwg" <ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org> schrieb am 22.12.2015 19:45:18: > Von: Danny Mayer <mayer@ntp.org> > An: Richard Welty <rwelty@nwtime.org>, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > Datum: 22.12.2015 20:07 > Betreff: Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ntp- > network-time-security-12.txt and draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-03.txt > Gesendet von: "ntpwg" <ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org> > > On 12/22/2015 9:52 AM, Richard Welty wrote: > > > > On 12/22/15 4:24 AM, dieter.sibold@ptb.de wrote: > >> You can see it in the draft "draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for- > ntp-03". There it is mentioned e.g. in > > sect. 6.1.3.2. The idea is that NTS for NTP defines one additional > > extension field (see section IANA registration) and that all > > NTS-messages are using this extension field. The different NTS message > > types are distinguished by their respective OID (see the next version of > > the draft "draft-ietf-ntp-cms-for-nts-message"). This also is true for > > the MAC. Kristof please correct me if I'm wrong. The field type of the > > NTS extension field is not registered yet. This has to be done as soon > > as possible. This was also discussed with the NTF. > > i believe the extension field type will be assigned by the IANA at the same > > time as the OIDs; please correct me if i'm wrong. > > Part of the problem is that section 6.1.3.2 mentions and extension field > MAC but does not describe it. We cannot go forward with this draft > unless there is already a MAC extension field draft to go along with it. > I have been intending to get this done but it doesn't exist yet unless > someone else is doing it. > > Danny > _______________________________________________ > ntpwg mailing list > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
_______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- Re: [ntpwg] Autokey, Shared keys Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] Autokey, Shared keys Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Salz, Rich
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Daniel Franke
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Daniel Franke
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Salz, Rich
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Rob Seaman
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Salz, Rich
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Salz, Rich
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Hal Murray
- [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-n… dieter.sibold
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… kristof.teichel
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… dieter.sibold
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Richard Welty
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… dieter.sibold
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… dieter.sibold
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Danny Mayer
- Re: [ntpwg] New Version Notification for draft-ie… Harlan Stenn
- [ntpwg] Antw: Re: New Version Notification for dr… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [ntpwg] Antw: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] Antw: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] Antw: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] Fwd: Early Allocations for NTS drafts… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] Fwd: Early Allocations for NTS drafts… Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [ntpwg] Fwd: Early Allocations for NTS drafts… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] Different security mechanisms (NTS, A… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] Fwd: Early Allocations for NTS drafts… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] Different security mechanisms (NTS, A… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] Fwd: Early Allocations for NTS drafts… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] WGLC on NTS: Round trips for key exch… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] WGLC on NTS: Round trips for key exch… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-… Hal Murray
- Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-… Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Salz, Rich
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Daniel Franke
- Re: [ntpwg] Parsing NTP packets regarding MACs an… Harlan Stenn