Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Getting started using NTS ‑‑ clock accuracy vs certificates

Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net> Tue, 02 August 2022 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C87C15C520 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 06:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GITGUZngyrMm for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 06:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chessie.everett.org (chessie.everett.org [66.220.13.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4E3C15C512 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 06:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.156] (pool-108-26-202-2.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.26.202.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by chessie.everett.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Lxww22Q0gzMP2n; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:34:58 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <dd362dc2-f432-0a87-6448-4b068bdf8140@pdmconsulting.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:34:57 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net>, Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <20220802074535.5EB0328C1CA@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
From: Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
In-Reply-To: <20220802074535.5EB0328C1CA@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/RY2ulr2c4YWwcL6GHaaGT0kdKaw>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] =?utf-8?q?Antw=3A_=5BEXT=5D_Re=3A_Getting_started_using_NT?= =?utf-8?q?S_=E2=80=91=E2=80=91_clock_accuracy_vs_certificates?=
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 13:35:09 -0000

On 8/2/22 3:45 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
> Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de said:
>> If you know ahead of time which IP address the device will get. I doubt that
>> for a typical spare part that should work without being configured before.
> The IP Address being discussed belongs to the server.
>
No it doesn't. If you have a system configured with a fixed IP address, 
and then it sits on the self for 10 years, what are the chances that it 
gets reused or the network you're plugging it into gets a whole new 
address range.

Danny