Re: [Ntp] NTP v5 feature requests
Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 14 January 2020 01:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86F412001B for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:57:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rnubUAnIWa4d for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:57:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7924612006F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:57:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id l8so10425303edw.1 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:57:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lla7m2o1opuyo8qMiX9130Z3BTlHbOd0DFDytki2AIg=; b=PLqhTnNYd9Ahyh+gTouLixXFZr6FhT1DT17bVc1Am/1CeltP9U3uRhGkgaS1B2SN1Q 6Sy5Wf3jPu7LJfXxr3qeywUciap/oVfk0WJt96EdLDhSTvTaN/AIlgsRkd58jXeD4TMK 02vJHRSfjJFWT3J7hN85BcvW80PANu9B8NISlaeN8gU7TDvI0tgKUMlTuF3S0f7ivw2s Uy/e2yCasxorSm86MrC/XOCzZb3YmaHTHKjFs2bJLVJeu1VpTBu25JBK4AxL4AF+Dx82 8L8t73jtmuV95LS6/vMdPbRPg+jAcHB2YPqWUIVWg9zf7v4cwgm04NjPVWp4cC3DmUc0 Ht9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lla7m2o1opuyo8qMiX9130Z3BTlHbOd0DFDytki2AIg=; b=OGwYWj0GCK6pLu7A5tVThLwfk8gIFw+OsrkXf70c+yakQT53cRZ6e64XxNZijqU1WI d3SV8QYL3zTnGlPwablkclzCYrFaJoTXRys6EFN5g0N9xbUCH5aFNnRcXmIk95hImVP3 rJuKHXMSnm+mQza6XUre8vOhhvbd/n/Q6GTN0nYFHMxmUhDp6AXaX7BE5jbGNIYyB7G+ rzX8+qcyyFds1sj3iHIUBCu7AyQmhXDezqPXXqwYpsx1rsH1UGoJZPpH13eURmHc9WYN yFndeJt5AvAWOxFbkGZniy2L1rDOCw9BZANy2oJTPhj25gWOnBVGVSIsxXU8NORB31PO WaQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXua7ij56S7c0aO5I5oWdSANJemdOLkEMDuz57byJOYB9rw0/t/ 2cM482aVkIOtL+jU2W//4bLkwIsNgI/SDrzsC1g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx37oJVFkjqOXuzBYhgY/B6krZbCNAucQWmE0ZOqWnowS/8PcMnGuERxBqFNWNoiuz0+LCIXs9rZycyP+eJKcI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:282:: with SMTP id l2mr21173270edv.187.1578967036857; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:57:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM0PR08MB4546CB091DFA4C3F8A055968F8490@AM0PR08MB4546.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR08MB4546CB091DFA4C3F8A055968F8490@AM0PR08MB4546.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:57:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMGpriW2uAmPLEjYHv6aJF+=RCs1dX0tbZB2tpVC8EceOD3Mmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000581222059c0fe9a9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/SqcVWNQrLY1leXji7cY5STeNtSs>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] NTP v5 feature requests
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 01:57:21 -0000
N00b question: are MTU issues relevant at all? Should, for example, NTPv5 be more RFC 8085#section-3.2 friendly? On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:41 AM Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > thanks to Miroslav we have a page at the NTP Wiki where we can compile > issues of NTPv4 which should be fixed in a new version of NTP. The link to > this side is: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ntp/wiki/NtpVersionFourIssues > > I added a second page which is meant to collect features that from your > point of view are missing in NTPv4 and should be added to a new version of > NTP. The link to this side is: > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ntp/wiki/NtpV5FeatureRequests > The first entries are from Kristof. Thanks for that. > > Both of these lists shall serve to formulate requirements for NTPv5. > Thanks for contributing. > > - Dieter > > _______________________________________________ > ntp mailing list > ntp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp >
- [Ntp] NTP v5 feature requests Dieter Sibold
- Re: [Ntp] NTP v5 feature requests Erik Kline