IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for NTP) to Proposed Standard

James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com> Fri, 19 February 2021 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B08D3A104D for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:13:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mEGXQkEdx5K for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x930.google.com (mail-ua1-x930.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::930]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB013A1073 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x930.google.com with SMTP id r19so1713550uak.0 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:13:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rOQr1P/e4YgGb25OLukGCqNCGzDYarHYnEI19WbwFmU=; b=LIsyuf4CXRQwdmiDw2owq1dz6u6+2FS7h/Oi57rPd55nDinjuA6UnlkZGrn/E6+/s/ DGas4EgMWSEuC07qdMhjqLIlllUYBTCOy4/fAj4BF63m1Uvd/EigNXjUZG/9LFla2QNx Z47WQno0MKHzO8xp6uMcv5QKqr7eteMalftslE1auDSnYOaPouW9FbFyeXkVaQdML0uO ETnyuExe+7vocSCI0HeJkAlVRM09o6e0NTMsAECLNd5+ObFRfKVFsJBk0eYifCb4Cs6m Hwd4a2aRK/njCuUA1dSD6yfHWxOxsUDgYaMHTvq0dCn7I4G+dlwkmtRnrQy62vn8jt/w F7Ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=rOQr1P/e4YgGb25OLukGCqNCGzDYarHYnEI19WbwFmU=; b=fsv9HTCy0HAzOPCuPFyV08YAVr4thvrBJnDujiixQqkILHyJKa3RJ45lKWeux7b6cC EY3+sUBgLa21xiYhcmkZIf2RYNaPXFPFSsMqF+oqbBR6UKfw9WEH+w7dwRHrVhEtPzdm hYLFWPxH5jU9K1Y2rJLWB4NdDE7oO2s5SY8WnyUfPmo9hz0xa9trIw1riQdKbrKPXzWT iI2pncyp+qO3x+lkb3+aIFvwAqDe592piupJ04zoaOk3ih/8XephwvHQBrA2U0936G5H ikpzYCqdSQoau8IVC21qRxM7O1QvgOk+1JK3IlShvxdulam96P/xEDfzQqoMFJ91yHbg aMkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KG8fZM0Qv2TqhjF7obrxA80MrpZG8pJma6hJzBcHFxyTzMeyq jCHMn2ZzqegnuOFQXNWB2GVncASit+pWJ+ecSFWNSXkN3w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwv/lf9NzY2RxACr3UTCsoQeDcsqwS/A7LHiVCUyNTmbFvXL0fAbaZ9Bq34Ce5LpJahjsBLI2pzox1vRDqHOYc=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6cf9:: with SMTP id l25mr5427074uai.131.1613751232840; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:13:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161195994417.2651.6499166797756243533@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAB75xn5CQr2yg7wWZHj-sJM7WaaTJK5NF0pzzLhqmx5hHf8GiQ@mail.gmail.com> <60266E12.6070207@btconnect.com> <602A611E.4020306@btconnect.com> <CAB75xn7QVL+F_5bQ8roZYakbADgQ06pChb0ei7Oaf0=eqLu7Mg@mail.gmail.com> <602D0CF9.9090404@btconnect.com> <602F9344.7000808@btconnect.com> <606b2602-a7ba-c6f7-c6d3-5883721a1575@pdmconsulting.net> <7B08EF68-0A3D-49BD-B6F0-206E4E6FF112@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <7B08EF68-0A3D-49BD-B6F0-206E4E6FF112@akamai.com>
From: James Browning <jamesb.fe80@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:13:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFTY+dDC4ns8xhQCy14Lj=Hmc1wT1wZLaxHQnQ-9pgEqG0GGNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd4d5d05bbb2bcda"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/U2ruo-sRjqvHq7ozUBk5HWig4HY>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-10.txt> (A YANG Data Model for NTP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:13:55 -0000

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021, at 7:06 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I thought a Yang model was supposed to be an on-the-wire representation of
> what the server did. Am I wrong? If I'm right, then the issue around MD5 is
> with the server, not this doc.
>

My (mis)understanding is that a server that has an IPv6 server peer will
send the four octets extracted from the MD5 hash of the peers' address in
the refid field of its responses.

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email