[Ntp] What happened to the data minimization work?
Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net> Sun, 12 June 2022 23:24 UTC
Return-Path: <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76F3C14792E for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IdAJ5C9iXAEz for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (d.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44AFDC14F74E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.137.68.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 25CNOT0Y012158 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:24:29 -0700
Received: from hgm (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E640D28C1CA; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7.1
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
cc: Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net>
From: Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:24:28 -0700
Message-Id: <20220612232428.E640D28C1CA@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVaKgWUXAXO9PX4ds2sMDxzE1F9awtYpeRudGh0gFKnhUPanx2GAP+7MsoF5xGCDSaW8IKvAKSAZWLRphduAhWIL0IdYExCBzqw=
X-Sonic-ID: C;KneDzqbq7BGPR6G3XTPn8g== M;CJW0zqbq7BGPR6G3XTPn8g==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: -1.5/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/U9xyqW4Ee1wPxkxx1xu4a5QqIng>
Subject: [Ntp] What happened to the data minimization work?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 23:24:33 -0000
I see draft 04 that expired in September 26, 2019 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ntp-data-minimization-04 It looks good to me. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.