Re: [Ntp] NTS IANA request

Publish a letter from the group to firewall, security managers and auditors explaining this. the commercial users will move within a year or two at max.  Make it a IETF security notice BCP document as well.

//tsg

Sent from my HTC, so please excuse any typos.

----- Reply message -----
From: "Danny Mayer" <mayer@ntp.org>
To: <ntp@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ntp] NTS IANA request
Date: Fri, Jun 7, 2019 17:31

On 6/6/19 2:28 PM, Daniel Franke wrote:
> As a slight tangent, we never concluded the discussion as to what
> we're going to do about the fact that so many ISPs are dropping
> 123/udp traffic with payloads larger than 48 bytes. I think we got as
> far as concluding:
>
> 1. We're never going to persuade enough ISPs to change their policy,
> making 123/udp basically doomed.
> 2. NTS-KE's port negotiation record gives us all the mechanism we need
> in order to run NTP-with-NTS over an alternate port.

We do what we did for EDNS0, get the firewall folks to change their
policies to allow for larger payloads. It will takes years but firewall
people have to move with changes as they happen.

Danny

_______________________________________________
ntp mailing list
ntp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp