Re: [Ntp] Routing asymmetries in v5
Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Mon, 13 April 2020 04:03 UTC
Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872C73A0E40 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SIiIPQpqQLnY for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D1F3A0DB9 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id z12so7458254ilb.10 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KmciAOriYkGtG3ZDIN9rHJ/JVA9Y2gvKHqcu+s8UeLM=; b=dGloZgQWOSFYvZ5C4nyQfhJO/7BrcnkQULE+Bb/X47PzSw+b5J4ZlKEd1vJvSeJO6G gqkA6CVWmir66hdydRXWZZ0zQiiC4RNiJoaYUrjSfpuJy65y4VDrXUg3plIMc0PZdDhi Av5Be0Sr/bigArB8GN9QUUMPFmIq7/9tZE9MaqgNxskP5w2IIsjS7BTl8I5Kp+vCvcCA vxLil4N573xGxK+8qV8uCgwj+vTwTSbzdeuFPffpd5Gs6tldaPVb+vdLr11Jl61mUtnQ t6LRcnuooXRWwioSAJBGEpYNyXGd1D+zIo4WlSIVB9X6idzI51k5YGWQcXBPiCGmCIUz 3tJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KmciAOriYkGtG3ZDIN9rHJ/JVA9Y2gvKHqcu+s8UeLM=; b=MKhsb1YSTHL4qWatO1EiqrRwk8SnkDXA0lDyWNOsNPpBlpLD2N6DmJHcuuJSiiaiGY L2z0cbCrMtGXPNx78j7HMuqhMyIRaJarIyhcOXq6hNpyTOY0C7c0I0OytksFni8dZo92 u18FCo2NpbSWRUBMIMQyeiaAEeU2S/lJRYvBa27FKS+rsncCXnNUZT1O3m8L/THyHU/h c9LKgQN/fWYImlAUzAZQwuwanuxBa+KCjviAW6x1TPiT3ylUEQ8Usw6g3obcU7r+pTEf CZAfPMIUkIMCACewxWKKoQXF+wnPjSs30FS1mXOgym+vxBT50zXuQxE+YhDi9vvADQsG A3Bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaHQ1z3G6W/XibR1blXtWD9xGDDGLQfBa12a9wzoqsGapCYJuRX RUVrFl9Lvfbug+nf/K0XlodLlXOyW0OngO/rrws=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJcIDkwPDl2n5XdUfHQgvsjpTV4hym9ry65iUPymm76ZAjk470t2SSLb5+1FtJI6ItxG+J5PoR+36XLeEhaVc0=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:dcc8:: with SMTP id b8mr14936257ilr.244.1586750594511; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACsn0cn9LMrkQmQLyOCqsXjzcJ=uadEprrp+Ndnb=6q6YVkgPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0cn9LMrkQmQLyOCqsXjzcJ=uadEprrp+Ndnb=6q6YVkgPg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 00:03:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJm83bBsS+=it_EYLG+Ox=o1FQnR_PTA4enG=xmEMyZZ5jYCHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/dAxizJ0Aho5upYtLBpY2ZL68WB0>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Routing asymmetries in v5
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 04:03:29 -0000
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 9:42 PM Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote: > > Definitely it should be a draft! I'm happy to write text to make it so. If you or anyone else wants to run with this and turn it into a full spec, by all means go for it. Put yourself as lead author and put me second. Otherwise I'll probably do it myself eventually but I don't know when.
- [Ntp] Routing asymmetries in v5 Watson Ladd
- Re: [Ntp] Routing asymmetries in v5 Daniel Franke
- Re: [Ntp] Routing asymmetries in v5 Daniel Franke
- Re: [Ntp] Routing asymmetries in v5 Danny Mayer