IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Danny's Review (was Re: draft‑ietf‑ntp‑roughtime‑05: tag change makes implementation more complex)

Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net> Mon, 04 October 2021 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655AB3A0BDB for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 07:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9dsohWIDTBZe for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 07:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chessie.everett.org (chessie.everett.org [66.220.13.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 865C23A0BF4 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 07:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from newusers-MBP.fios-router.home (pool-108-26-179-179.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.26.179.179]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chessie.everett.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HNNxY1nmBzMNQg; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:53:05 +0000 (UTC)
To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>, Rich Salz <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, taralx@gmail.com
Cc: watsonbladd@gmail.com, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, Marcus Dansarie <marcus@dansarie.se>
References: <CAGZkp1-ZCuSvMyQyWCnE511O8-WL=OXfsTdraKsByMmWC3spVA@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cnjHFwxHT13nMavRFzRteWJ=SORY8v4RCZjdjYP0H3oaw@mail.gmail.com> <7dde7eb3-4dc7-94d3-e63a-6d5d0736b1c2@pdmconsulting.net> <54baf1fa-b138-4eb8-6f4e-99168cf2db7b@dansarie.se> <0a95d35f-f708-4a3c-4ecf-77597c42a7a4@pdmconsulting.net> <CACsn0c=gdQWDumfzeHYYWzXPV4sz4J9mTUtYW+4=KueaHHbGdQ@mail.gmail.com> <79dfd56c-54e8-8b85-ed9d-da9fac71d1f1@pdmconsulting.net> <c95eaafb-f294-a54e-d495-0cf74e574686@pdmconsulting.net> <CACsn0cmks2fdwem1rS+QNzCL1WhNR4890Fi1zpjQrL=E3Y=3fQ@mail.gmail.com> <684af837-0713-9293-168b-8b140bf15d22@pdmconsulting.net> <CAGZkp183CgJJOd5O5dDdeKtAzgCobwBzpZe3ixBWJ-ZLQXB6bg@mail.gmail.com> <edee8b51-47b4-3a33-436e-b235fdcf6b99@pdmconsulting.net> <981D597A-2484-47C9-AA99-F95E6623F51D@akamai.com> <aba9eb26-31dd-2a6e-2146-9e271c90a9ab@pdmconsulting.net> <14983DF9-548C-4AE7-9AC6-8506745DE183@akamai.com> <615AAE3A020000A100044307@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
From: Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
Message-ID: <38fe36de-9001-ad8b-8e01-51b9ee4afab6@pdmconsulting.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:53:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <615AAE3A020000A100044307@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/dOxS4bf7_5jvE6DPbE0MzgcMjFY>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Danny's Review (was Re: draft‑ietf‑ntp‑roughtime‑05: tag change makes implementation more complex)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 14:54:01 -0000

On 10/4/21 3:33 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>    >>> "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> schrieb am 29.09.2021 um
> 17:30
> in Nachricht <14983DF9-548C-4AE7-9AC6-8506745DE183@akamai.com>:
>> *   Can you point to an existing RFC where the protocol name is in the
>> header? Is there something useful about it that the security folks think it
>> would be a good addition? Any other references to make sense of this?
>>
>> Does ALPN count?  It’s a protocol identifier in the TLS clientHello message.
>>   There’s lots of ALPN identifiers picked,
>>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values/tls-extensiontype-v
>
>> alues.xhtml#alpn-protocol-ids
>>
>> For HTTP, the h2 identifier when connecting over TCP.
> Would SMTP count also?
>
I don't think that the string "SMTP" appears anywhere in the exchange. 
"MAIL" does but that's not what we are talking about.

Danny

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email