IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] IANA request language

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Thu, 20 February 2020 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749F31200E5 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:33:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7W1uCMaKYRMd for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF09E12002E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id i7so24707810ilr.7 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:33:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ts2MsQIV6OhsrvRR3QeAzs8/BU4YzcsT6oPlMgRmRxM=; b=olwBk5wEDLYCHaHTS8lK/3ZODvA68gfIbZmJnJW1fTo2h1icYkAuCSjg+3mcRR+FTg gvhMJNftCs8NlBJ8ZPsEq/Xg0UkXURsDUcHglBIirAA6FBwJoXITRozT4PIyDmPPwqKW AgTuen/Izx4JbTjntfgBGeVAIdSF2eHEPNNYhRIBkHD6gIiPhnYb3tY0E+Mq4FwHoCob B5BGF8xhxxEgHjPovOFbTrovmIKRw5aCSM5PTUmKhczDQ42JR1EZNT6PPfiaWENLKtxI i2SaNqrwCu/HM30JuwH0YR98MH5cLOAVY9trPjtzEWWLzyTm1rUj0usw+1G3P61Ltlrr Vtvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ts2MsQIV6OhsrvRR3QeAzs8/BU4YzcsT6oPlMgRmRxM=; b=L/GGBwn46UVlLjPCj/4oDydQe77dPITksayeVEcMQdHo8CVjoLRM3omzPnMEbkDOaM 1TQVmXX/j2Lm26fFplAY88AW0TQsM+/EX2F0UW/vZy6Oly6WEenyDbcRNvBidvChYjKj UJfiZZpfaHZr0K9NW0wVpFDwTa1P4mtyHBag6w0Y19jbNwlz/QEqxPEuJIvhA3pXpTqZ OPBjUSdpOOg/n5D9cryq1Gg1KI8a2+XrtazZ8Wyv6/OxwHPDyB9cHMpU6ytqpQtGnSpA RIhqs0QcsUI7o2cC2KAMiaCrXmMvjv0F3FapUireq0C7TeklE/YKnvhAYyUXXvkycyBz 7fmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkXmJONoxxLmZih64ykf+JlrMVBGfLcHi6BfBJFxUaKk+ciXTB NArZ9Y1teAUdh6hGPb0hCXOHN1BHUWjLZNvqk5E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtDh73foV0un9QS//Dwx9H2XVV/aaKA3itf3abWLsA5nQr64TyhH+Yylb55Hy74VFxIPUYZJGLPNxW3TKZgo4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8f44:: with SMTP id j65mr30426036ild.144.1582227199026; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:33:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200220192612.8E70840605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <CAN2QdAHFFhnmoK0sGGW+U8Kt=AS1x2gnV1qVP=s9BEyUuhhCUA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN2QdAHFFhnmoK0sGGW+U8Kt=AS1x2gnV1qVP=s9BEyUuhhCUA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:33:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJm83bBPMdp3qA=Us64QrE1x7WSZi5jDUAEYr7teWKJ9jDMwdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watson=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/fW4KFcHYeURJYXhjkKwvPv0kjVM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] IANA request language
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:33:21 -0000

Before publication the RFC editor will change the IANA Considerations
section to reflect what was actually done rather than what we're
asking be done. This is standard procedure and we don't need to
include any special language requesting this.

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:31 PM Watson Ladd
<watson=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:26 AM Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > marcus@dansarie.se said:
> > > No objections here either, other than that it probably should have a "remove
> > > before publication" note.
> >
> > It's not clear to me what that "it" binds to - the proposed new text or the
> > whole section.
> >
> > I think the whole IANA Considerations section should get removed.
> >
> > The next section has a clear indication:
> >   Implementation Status - RFC EDITOR: REMOVE BEFORE PUBLICATION
>
> IANA Considerations are generally not removed from published RFCs to
> the best of my knowledge.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email