Re: [Ntp] for the Interim
"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 06 June 2022 14:21 UTC
Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420EAC14F72D for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.745, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6MpBRYDJlLQ for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 967EAC157B3A for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 256CCmSD008525; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 15:21:41 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=9NvleHRDlrnQ0IhDQnUcCnQqDtFD1YgUiUrugTcJPfw=; b=VXRjYyrUYFiQU4K78+vQUwaYaqlzQzbekO4vjJ7f2qGj7zGaBxAO54HH6JhjYNEifzV8 kykUlvwSDnQIADLIz24tfrcKTf4Uj0IBrr1KXM4ViquRNA2fo659VFb29mHlkJuzh1Zn NC4L7d2dc0OlPv1s9v3xd3av7qH0oXg5xurFg6lwf/kw5InvLKFs0aZOkaHvEtwTA0eZ GMAzfj0D9i794TxOjRlttz/b8X2ojR+BrM9rb3Iu31hlb4YZa2QhcOGN7VS2ttLGo5Rt yKXePvpqvb3/WIVn0vFueno+qocrlTq1H1MSRGzefDKIICMElTP9/OXvrhkZ8NEB8iMV lA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gfxx97c08-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Jun 2022 15:21:40 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 256EKDCA024912; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:21:38 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3ggyfx2e2m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:21:38 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) by usma1ex-dag4mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:21:37 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.36; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:21:37 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.036; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:21:36 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] for the Interim
Thread-Index: AQHYd2e8Nvn47xwzT063FcMpodrvfK1CidCA///5mIA=
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 14:21:36 +0000
Message-ID: <DBE38883-19B0-4975-901E-06F68F4F841F@akamai.com>
References: <203D7A93-444A-46B6-B8EA-0B5B52E926F7@akamai.com> <0233DE49-ECE4-40DA-8427-E874D52CEB8B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0233DE49-ECE4-40DA-8427-E874D52CEB8B@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.61.22050700
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DBE3888319B04975901E06F68F4F841Fakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.517, 18.0.874 definitions=2022-06-06_04:2022-06-02, 2022-06-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=671 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206060066
X-Proofpoint-GUID: WvJbCr8k89pp-ocswjIxfGqCxqdS9i8V
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: WvJbCr8k89pp-ocswjIxfGqCxqdS9i8V
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-06_04,2022-06-03_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=624 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206060066
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/iiBCUYg4q5vsKm0ygL1fCLRm5mM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] for the Interim
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 14:21:46 -0000
Thank you for the careful reading! * Sec. 2.2 states that RFC 5906 defines 30 extensions (15 each for request and response). From what I see, Sec 13 of RFC 5906 specifies 30 extensions: 10 for request and response messages and 10 for error response messages. I changed this to “(10 each for request, response, and error response)” * Sec. 2.2, first bullet point: From my point of view the bullet point does not clearly indicate which values are considered as erroneous: the values in the registry or in the implementation? They are errors in the registry. I had hoped the introductory sentence made it clear. I changed the last sentence to this: “This document marks the erroneous values as reserved, in case there is an implementation that used the registered values instead of what the original implementation used” Does that make it clear enough? Changes are in the editor’s copy at https://github.com/richsalz/draft-rsalz-update-registries
- [Ntp] for the Interim Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] for the Interim Dieter Sibold
- Re: [Ntp] for the Interim Salz, Rich
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: for the Interim Ulrich Windl