Re: [Ntp] comments on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-23

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 26 March 2020 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92CB3A0CCC; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 05:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8K_tEUWGwMrL; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 05:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB9B3A0CFD; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 05:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2CC28B003B; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9693C1F804E; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:03:24 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <43842926-38F3-4274-904B-AEBE8248E9A2@tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:03:23 -0400
Cc: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <99D9C210-3F59-405E-8F74-E4DED592493F@tislabs.com>
References: <F5D62F1F-6705-4DEE-8A24-C7DAEAC02AB0@tislabs.com> <43842926-38F3-4274-904B-AEBE8248E9A2@tislabs.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org, Ragnar Sundblad <ragge@netnod.se>, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/jujmROFVdnGvzi3r1kI0tc2AWyg>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] comments on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-23
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:03:42 -0000

My responses took the form of general comments in the message text and a bunch of detailed comments in an attachment.  I’m going to respond to whether they were were addressed in v26 in two messages.  One will cover the detailed comments, this time inline the message text (an attachment was a mistake).  The other will cover the general comments.

—Sandy