Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions
Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net> Sat, 28 October 2023 07:36 UTC
Return-Path: <halmurray@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6EEC17C517; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 00:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lu3neHGgfKXV; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 00:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18D01C17C516; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 00:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (104-182-38-69.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [104.182.38.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 39S7a6oT009259 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Oct 2023 00:36:06 -0700
Received: from hgm (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CDF28C20C; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 00:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.8
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
cc: Daniel Havey <dahavey=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net>
From: Hal Murray <halmurray@sonic.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> of "Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:17:59 +0200." <ZTjBJz4CkgD0LQU6@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 00:36:06 -0700
Message-Id: <20231028073606.08CDF28C20C@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVajnfyN7DBKNJhvXC7BCRhyMemjegNB0uQXhNzF7Ck/48y8WmXhJMpgfT2IRT8oQeafNV0mrJujJHlP6+jOZskfgs4rpAlNexM=
X-Sonic-ID: C;JNh4p2R17hGHyS5nR+6Zsg== M;+C6Kp2R17hGHyS5nR+6Zsg==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: -1.5/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/nv9QmdCgVh0JEUiAiPDtXL02ft8>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 07:36:13 -0000
mlichvar@redhat.com said: > NTS requires TLSv1.3, which is not FIPS-compliant (yet?). At least that's > what I heard when I asked why gnutls blocks TLSv1.3 in FIPS mode. To confirm Daniel's comments, NTS works in NTPsec using OpenSSL in FIPS mode. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions Daniel Havey
- Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions Daniel Franke
- Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions Erik Kline
- Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions Daniel Franke
- Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions Miroslav Lichvar