Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode
Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> Mon, 31 July 2017 18:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A87132769 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nOAFsVthCzw for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (psp3.ntp.org [185.140.48.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B79132751 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (unknown [127.0.0.235]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E4386DB9A for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:31:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (fortinet.ntp.org [10.224.90.254]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB94986DAB4 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:31:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from chessie.everett.org ([66.220.13.234]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <stenn@nwtime.org>) id 1dcFT0-000IZS-K3 for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:31:07 +0000
Received: from hms-mbp11.pfcs.com (96-41-166-181.dhcp.mdfd.or.charter.com [96.41.166.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chessie.everett.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98699B8A3; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:30:57 +0000 (UTC)
To: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
References: <707deca2-9037-c9fc-69bc-71ee80cb4c97@nwtime.org> <CAJm83bBjUU_PHhOcH4Sa7LdE2JEN3wojmXTWv_F_nnnRQz61Rw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>
Message-ID: <c251d5c2-ae87-7c66-7b08-f3bc68680be8@nwtime.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:30:56 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bBjUU_PHhOcH4Sa7LdE2JEN3wojmXTWv_F_nnnRQz61Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 66.220.13.234
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stenn@nwtime.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ntpwg <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
On 7/31/17 11:26 AM, Daniel Franke wrote: > On Jul 31, 2017 1:47 PM, "Harlan Stenn" <stenn@nwtime.org> wrote: > >> Dave Mills recalls seeing a message where it was stated that DTLS is >> great for client/server associations, but DTLS was not an >> efficient/effective/whatever way to establish a symmetric association. > > > I recall you asserting this in Prague but I haven't seen said message or > anything else which would substantiate this claim. Do you have details? No, which is why I'm asking the question. Is DTLS well-suited for symmetric associations, which require mutual authentication? -- Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode Daniel Franke
- Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode Harlan Stenn
- Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode Job Snijders
- Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode Aanchal Malhotra
- Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode Daniel Franke
- Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode Miroslav Lichvar
- [ntpwg] Antwort: Re: NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode dieter.sibold
- Re: [ntpwg] Antwort: Re: NTS: DTLS and symmetric … Miroslav Lichvar