Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5 modular architecture update
Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Fri, 24 July 2020 08:44 UTC
Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5658E3A0BFB for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.035
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QK_PKj7_zCMb for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3203A0AC5 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A956540605C; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> of "Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:00:24 +0200." <5F1A8708020000A10003A3E0@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:44:22 -0700
Message-Id: <20200724084422.A956540605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/q5-bhsM2TxM6F2T5oflIH5H8PNQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5 modular architecture update
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:44:28 -0000
> What about having an optional data minimization module? > Authentication module and privacy module? Privacy and data minimization doesn't seem appropriate for a module or a box on the chart. It's a small change to the basic packet. Authentication makes sense as a module or two. It adds a wrapper to the basic packet, but no changes to it. But that brings up an interesting point. What is the purpose of this chart? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- [Ntp] NTPv5 modular architecture update Doug Arnold
- Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 modular architecture update Dieter Sibold
- Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 modular architecture update Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 modular architecture update Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 modular architecture update Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] NTPv5 modular architecture update Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5 modular architecture … Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: NTPv5 modular architect… Hal Murray