Re: [Ntp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-15: (with COMMENT)

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 09 December 2021 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66B73A0FD7; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:00:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tKNuVlByFpnT; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:00:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F414A3A1056; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 09:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id e128so7389413iof.1; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 09:00:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Lyf3LCxEz4IMqv7XxPGErLED/JcphHJo6K3BtizK3sU=; b=QMqTfgVNCcK4mrtoBlZzs6clEUpGQTSwsFQ8k+85n3tK/+iqouBdTvkM0iQiv+mwD3 qeF+spNMyaLQUKkFNtsNYETOC9MCo4em6R/lGp50WE5J3HP1PNiLPhRId5LLuAL0z1Gi QkROdNVRLlJqZW+a8S96HH3du3a6jusqC3YqsuD45qiX3ipmbLRONN3cYASlP9C6FU2I mEpobmiPrMkgJ9il9omY08f3aa1xP9BxtuReIFSjqrL7O7eF0Bx0KOkYtBpWbbgSfhkh cdXnTCVb9Pmi5M1LW+8h3Hxxd9ohhXK+hm/gTgE3fquxqIgJ+TteTDYUiADGjov2vEq0 RJcA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lyf3LCxEz4IMqv7XxPGErLED/JcphHJo6K3BtizK3sU=; b=Ws8Pjnrl7o/ALHQ+Ucc7nTmXDwbzqsoiO6kiRnC9aEnHFba1SrYvLV94zTySFRw0qg WEpbgjqh8YxMRsUF27gGjLRZ40kM7wEPnvBiwieUyZrWRfZpI9VHCKKyMW9JuOj8geQR iEYN6Mmg7GHc4Uwc804rYnqAZpaVXJj8DUdriecFwmvkRRLpZbOqa6FimieGW85Tt7lt pLJ3aj6TbPhoptjXKYtoE5a8pUXhpn4okFb7S1rOkk6AVVoYoVXL6TjyZ1j825gUW15n QrFe14wHHc/obUv56SFjkhztNsDX1kgpfv3HHHg4cUqsn0M2Yzm6VhQHCyixMRMuiIyS V9eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oXaVyeGACUWj8Ca8v6knN28UxDluPTj2/PY1Fy6WprB9c39tX K4yX4E22xL/GlyVvsVmgrNkRWmFy4mGTxHvfzhFLysia
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGJSEmY0B7wZt5z7j2sZv5zO3kBao54AZBN0ZFLs5SVcNYTWa1GkNpDtfn7/dtlAc7LbAUYXgoff0YwGyBHKg=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:1949:: with SMTP id b70mr10303703jab.7.1639069225537; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 09:00:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162514050416.16666.6433814892429725065@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <162514050416.16666.6433814892429725065@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 22:29:49 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6T1W0fQMUw3Dgw1G1J6dKfPdeyz+HeEXQ8SOVHHTf6xA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model@ietf.org, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>, Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f353ad05d2b98a2c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/t2BXs2yjg3WXAN-b35WNWuSF0t0>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 17:00:44 -0000

Hi Rob,

Firstly let me apologize for this very late reply. Secondly thanks for your
review. I was finally able to make all the changes.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 5:25 PM Robert Wilton via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-15: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for this document.  It is always nice to see another YANG model
> being
> standardized.  I would also like to thank both Andy, for his YANG Doctor
> review, and Tom for his help on reviewing and improving the YANG model.
>
> I have only a few questions/comments on the draft itself.
>
> Section 5 talks about Access Rules, and I didn't know whether it might be
> helpful to indicate that this section is referring only to on-the-wire peer
> access control, and is independent of any management API access control,
> that
> could be enabled by, e.g., NACM (8341)?
>
>
Dhruv: ACK



> It is good to report the NTP statistics, but it might also be helpful to
> define
> an action to allow clients to reset those statistics, although this could
> be
> deferred to a future revision.
>
>
Dhruv: I have added the rpc "statistics-reset" for this.



> Finally, I note that there was another NTP related draft on the telechat
> this
> week, (draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-05), that suggests that
> "interleaved
> symmetric mode" should be configured.  Does this YANG model cover
> configuring
> that option, or would this be regarded as future work?
>
>
Dhruv: That one is left for the future!



> Regards,
> Rob
>
>
>
>
Thanks!
Dhruv

Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-15&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-16.txt
Working Copy:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-16.txt

Consolidated Review Status:
https://notes.ietf.org/draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model