Re: [Ntp] Leap second draft

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A99512032A for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xdJOvMI_-9ij for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D4F12031B for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id w5so3763835qtb.11 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vdpKQ0JfDKUNehbQj2Nk/w77oWlejNcFQiViiWoRqqk=; b=GtKhwpWNELRoRa167e5/PAwL0lMtmcIzlYL1Ic49TH1kzMcWd+ULpZBcQnsWsa0Y6f I/eXA5u5uNL3091ebk+P8rMSb9obqHjgrtn5VeFdGuwnHMuhVt5JTOYlvXqH4oUFn56+ O3LwXKAet9Um0izd61oKjP6K32kr0yttuHvUg0tZNqmxlAwnEDOd61ttOLQ0DWN80Vxp TrnvK/Arph75RqxIxmhN1sW0DhNXcFIYvkmbDeAWBF58FiH0oQIX31E6V6Nf9fHi/8FR pTFzQmP58FV6OAOQP083YvfmpBslgIJxt8LYLlmbfkMWA/E1bNvZvagJ8Ff5g3z05dG7 F0Yw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=vdpKQ0JfDKUNehbQj2Nk/w77oWlejNcFQiViiWoRqqk=; b=ZJBRSD0S5LycrCxuy+DiPFmhw7vrPRfD/EXnfVcieqOxCzEGQc0+4NQxIQ62WI3B5C rR0GDdYhCkPxxDxrQiXS/KB1OJQOqiLM06PQcaVvQxmcAKJU4kYyJn/tTPsdUPCNX4C2 Fnv1p3eUwKRE4Ecks3hkQryD9UcerOWKMnmw0NFm1nEn2Aoa/K1493a/SMW945/4Rt4n hBu3GNrKw2Fz2my1oLd5+qSCI2Ca5mTHoYZJVC1C6sGVVHXikHrezIsmVhWK8p3UDqle s+YdAtY8XHu8MzTujk1A1mUg6teY2LlgvV62YgHNJI6hDSHhmRkuy+EjTscHuZgTcKNz Y0kA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV8sJUnPGOCt78cLzZ2qzk5OaHoJLyv2b2wbkpZa49WnZ1FCHHu b3SflrQCP+PdwA2nJUJWSjk7CCPFQNkUUALxtDTNnDcw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzOjVTJfNi1yY2NfcK13c6e6S+dwzXpQTWDWqw4oYkV5Q5rUgZK444NrfKjKeteLTFSn9/qKN/XIEsh9YFaa1M=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:29e1:: with SMTP id 30mr43824563qtt.13.1553889474146; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJm83bD5Ozkpg5TpkogOW6xeeNQL3ZziLO9URM7haqN8Wrp=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bD5Ozkpg5TpkogOW6xeeNQL3ZziLO9URM7haqN8Wrp=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:57:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJm83bCbVzO3NNCbjTy+O_16T7DBeA7O6018WWGu_-GyuN-8UA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000209b4405854116a3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/uvPXb96ET8NExja3o5E23cbBcsM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Leap second draft
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 19:58:01 -0000

I screwed up the datatracker submission by typoing my email address,
but here (attached) is draft 00 while I'm waiting for the secretariat
to get the submission unstuck.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 5:46 PM Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm writing up an I-D clarifying how NTP implementations are to behave
> in proximity to a leap second and also introducing an extension field
> that provides better leap-second-related information than is
> expressible using header fields alone, including giving the TAI-UTC
> offset.
>
> Karen, you mentioned a possible CfA for
> draft-stenn-ntp-extended-information if Harlan revises it to comply
> with RFC 7822 (-04 does not appear to comply). Our two drafts are
> partly redundant in purpose since they both provide TAI-UTC offset and
> we won't want to adopt both. Of course I think mine is the one we
> should adopt, but I'll strive to get a -00 submitted promptly so that
> they can be considered side-by-side without unduly delaying Harlan's
> CfA.