IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Wed, 25 October 2023 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01027C16F405 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85vurRJSpHdu for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA656C14F693 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1698218288; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=si/lKsidiu7qO4SDQaZPs97XSO6vs6RwWw+KTHxT83Q=; b=GkaNDxbfvpThA8lUxw1WEbTuEaYGkkCTnlZYkU6/fDEgo6gCLwuyta9p+TSb/r903TkWK0 plfbtHQkZDjYIlaw8dh4QW7vWLYJMLvJCJsnnMrMmuD7/8vDd1TRzc+9FMfBP0j84+h4ZF QuiQR3lSkp4ULXH8w72MlYdT3/t6gLM=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-362-I5AoP9RcNDyfmdljq6MMnw-1; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 03:18:06 -0400
X-MC-Unique: I5AoP9RcNDyfmdljq6MMnw-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD3273C0C880; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 07:18:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.43.135.229]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489C22166B27; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 07:18:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:17:59 +0200
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Havey <dahavey=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <ZTjBJz4CkgD0LQU6@localhost>
References: <MW4PR00MB1528917C9E2C8EA97FC297ACA7DEA@MW4PR00MB1528.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR00MB1528917C9E2C8EA97FC297ACA7DEA@MW4PR00MB1528.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.6
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/vkg6Izpxa_EomKyYaXRRc4xWzIQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] RFC 5297 Questions
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 07:18:12 -0000

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 12:23:58AM +0000, Daniel Havey wrote:
> I have 2 questions about NTS for NTP:

NTS requires TLSv1.3, which is not FIPS-compliant (yet?). At least
that's what I heard when I asked why gnutls blocks TLSv1.3 in FIPS
mode.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status