[Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Another sample of NTP filtering
Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Fri, 14 January 2022 07:28 UTC
Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E193A1D56 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 23:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6__RhLsmJjTv for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 23:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (mx2.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DACA3A1D54 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 23:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DC5C600004D for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:28:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx2.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070C36000048 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:28:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:28:43 +0100
Message-Id: <61E12629020000A100046ECE@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.3.1
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:28:41 +0100
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, halmurray+ietf@sonic.net
References: <20220114040054.1189228C1BF@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <20220114040054.1189228C1BF@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/vl9s5i0jSWdCAUEGKzFbe1NcKqY>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Another sample of NTP filtering
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 07:28:55 -0000
>>> Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net> schrieb am 14.01.2022 um 05:00 in Nachricht <20220114040054.1189228C1BF@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>: > I have a couple of servers in the pool. I've been testing shared key > authentication to my home, RFC 4493, 68 bytes > > One stopped working Dec 26. The other stopped Dec 30. Did the service stop, or did the connection stop? ;-) > > Both are working without authentication, 48 bytes. > IPv6 works with authentication. > > > ‑‑ > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > ntp mailing list > ntp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
- [Ntp] Another sample of NTP filtering Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Another sample of NTP filtering Ulrich Windl