Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09.txt

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 24 June 2020 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819763A0C59 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twrscLrLPO3n for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 746B23A0D7B for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05ODlG8t016770; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:48:46 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=9zBT4QeGfOnVVl87Dw5LisehD1tOMY5C/h//hPU0Vec=; b=Gb0yJcF+nIQlosd250K/Ruo7n8RUyoW1saaQV5dSETIDlq07tC/PiwIaFRCUatAc4clN LGJLtJ6aBFO5rpctHTp5F+4qA2BuufvW6hWsqJLjJ+ppCYnoKR3VLHVN472i1CwCeBtw iZIFrBu0vp1OYFBTAcfBYjNwyF6arJkqEHNEHLOBZ9oyu+Pg/P8jcZ/w7rS0YFAnBXOS ujgsklli9LiByxU8TeeV5Xwwes74gl/UWtN1lQlTpr18wEIDi8xzkwcwiNrptpLDQnth +fUaVxghvjw3sO2ZGuA5v1SYyA+BW8h8bkUrsGSBn1rKjVCHCuXbLWKqrgENSbNEDFVV UA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint4 (a72-247-45-32.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.32] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31uutk93k8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:48:46 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05ODacYg025817; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:48:45 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.117]) by prod-mail-ppoint4.akamai.com with ESMTP id 31uus93fy1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:48:45 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.124) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 06:48:44 -0700
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:48:44 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWSIcSE9+kdsbZ0Ea0hqkqNXJ0uajk04mA///4JICAAPY8gIAAwXuAgAFaxYD///3mAA==
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:48:44 +0000
Message-ID: <59AD4647-CC91-4603-B905-A84F7C7742A0@akamai.com>
References: <159282479414.12546.4960020164033916211@ietfa.amsl.com> <6941954c-07cb-2067-50b0-4e718dff110a@nwtime.org> <3B598EB4-FCCE-4AD6-B524-7D35A05494F0@akamai.com> <81de92a1-a695-8c86-c359-98c79af3811f@nwtime.org> <0402BACC-4569-41D9-AEE4-0D31E7F0888A@akamai.com> <655945c8-8785-bbba-c564-91946e4b3d4e@nwtime.org>
In-Reply-To: <655945c8-8785-bbba-c564-91946e4b3d4e@nwtime.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.38.20061401
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.116.32]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <82F2C285B953DA47866A34AC2EEBFCAA@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-24_07:2020-06-24, 2020-06-24 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=504 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006240098
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-24_07:2020-06-24, 2020-06-24 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=463 cotscore=-2147483648 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006240100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/x5Hld91ZcYa0oKqLHnUrXtpGLO8>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09.txt
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:49:48 -0000

    >> I know some prefer to deny the heritage.
    > 
    > I cannot comment to that.

    What is your opinion on the subject, then?

I have no informed opinion and will not comment.

>    Who gains by these attempts to strip the NTP Project's codebase of its
    rightfully- and long-earned title as a (complete) reference
    implementation of NTP?

Everyone and anyone who wants to do NTP without fear or favor.

>    By your logic, the IETF is also in no position to deny us that
    name/title, either.

I never said otherwise.  But the IETF should not use that term.