Re: [Ntp] NTP virtual interim - 14 Dec

Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net> Wed, 23 November 2022 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2125C14CE44 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:50:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKzaTKeRTfFy for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chessie.everett.org (chessie.everett.org [66.220.13.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC4FC14CE26 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:50:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.156] (pool-108-26-202-2.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.26.202.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by chessie.everett.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4NHTDB4B8fzMPX3; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:50:02 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------c7HWWFNcWCLLOA10FRm3Wc8K"
Message-ID: <e34c193f-3424-0085-a3e5-124c3946aad2@pdmconsulting.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 12:50:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue=40isoc.org@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <PH0PR06MB70612DC1AE19B7E86FD8CC0AC20D9@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR06MB70612DC1AE19B7E86FD8CC0AC20D9@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/xFaLbhUjPricSiRu6qTHnpStWoM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] NTP virtual interim - 14 Dec
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:50:30 -0000

Can you clarify the time. In some parts it says: 1600 UTC and in other 
parts it says 1630 UTC. Which one is correct?

Danny

On 11/22/22 11:05 AM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
>
> There will be a virtual interim meeting of the NTP working on 14 Dec 
> at 1600 UTC. The details are below:
>
> NTP WG Virtual Interim Meeting
>
> 14 November 2022, 1600-1730 UTC
>
> Draft Agenda
>
> 1. Administrative and Agenda Bashing
>
> 2. NTP/TICTOC WG Document Status Review/Update
>
> 3. NTPv5
>
>     - Use cases and requirements
>
>     - NTPv5 specification
>
> 5. Roughtime
>
> 6. Ongoing work needing updates
>
> 7. AOB and Way Forward
>
> Topic: NTP working group virtual interim - Dec 2022
>
> Time: Dec 14, 2022 04:30 PM GMT
>
> Join Zoom Meeting
>
> https://isoc.zoom.us/j/81419614296
>
> Meeting ID: 814 1961 4296
>
> Find your local number: https://isoc.zoom.us/u/kdFDJpdJ3W
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp