IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries

Sanjeev Gupta <ghane0@gmail.com> Mon, 01 August 2022 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ghane0@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4F4C15C50D for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 02:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2soWk1WYAeE for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 02:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C73C15AE3C for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 02:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w72so8080528oiw.6 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 02:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C25HCVKvpwXllJua9vgHRbiWmOvlcd8prjl8I5qNuOU=; b=c3HqNDc6R1iNHj8mF4dBJzflZWcXYblKiczFFP7QRf1ubxUvwf5aEqeVUClwpTcpCZ VJmD0yjAr+S44q813J6ylktye5eQa5rmu7MBm9jLzTcdK6pif+/kkH2AseC6UIaGESL/ aGjuR3Z3tMl5RVNAiXO//lnA+pF7+xI1Lq149TQkhs8l6B6+SPndP8oq4cachbQaTqHD GMfYyM0ewgxmFZDmgwZRYckMmb7aSGaADAch9XAe+AQWy2qzGqehPaCELaOlFlko1vKv +UjFPAW9EcIYiVUfFSh/3ZX33Q2v+aJZYUHyUU9ra2JEYqd6g3aMtAM9koBn0bylaBOU nzyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C25HCVKvpwXllJua9vgHRbiWmOvlcd8prjl8I5qNuOU=; b=lcpbKFUnXpa06ibNDXbyfwc1au7HDTUk5MGjy3LOaWNQXLBDtgWhcPxuCDBySQf1eP 49lVWdQDbxASdaNgzc9XPu0d8njlRrzK5Qwu8C1UGldOKXdTplDy2YO3DRPvurGUbdLi viwqWFCn7xqhEqWmAMyxi3cWILm3Ps8jUd1bGZTN4jwO0owVbwrlEGNRJ3HvOb/pwMPd 0boi0A4pbngUM84+teWdGtyq7nEMBsAiLR+fWU4MpY0aMPybIcYPWlnmuWTJ+R82T4wN 8BMaHYs0VlPcQ13tb2xuPFhTU9utGS2qxt1j7UDVPi7TAgJmE0CfoPTC25p+MjIWeRlx CJLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/8yP6ZdnxNeWLGCpMlFt0CWmATSHp5fSaGKtPrvSErz9V9PfJ/ R46t6VTgTUvkQyytBUO9oHquF4xvYxfzxzzrriw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1soMqxmwNel0ogDmLe7yQzdmMS5RQZdjKJzVKTV6ntX44Gkr5FbbFYEFesCUlw4QWeUE4z+bfM0befDPpHB1eI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:208d:b0:33a:a95f:8b7d with SMTP id s13-20020a056808208d00b0033aa95f8b7dmr5772223oiw.141.1659345136668; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 02:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH0PR06MB7061FA7A5B338D262B3A2963C2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR06MB7061FA7A5B338D262B3A2963C2999@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Sanjeev Gupta <ghane0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 17:12:04 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHZk5Wc7qWH7hM_b4gYVi6iK5-BmUCifVFr3nurE3VxZ+_Nocg@mail.gmail.com>
To: rsalz@akamai.com
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e55bd05e52a65aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/xe9Waqs1mmUQ5jnW9N4CJZbro5M>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Quick review of WGLC for status change for draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 09:12:20 -0000

Rich,

I am late to this review; but I have a minor change suggestion.  You use
the word "Reference" in two contexts:


   1.

   2.1.  Reference ID, Kiss-o'-Death,
   4.1.  NTP Reference Identifier Codes


   2.

   Reference (required): the publication defining the ID



As Reference has a specific meaning within NTP, would it be possible to
change the second case to something like "Documented" or "Publication"?

Thank you,
-- 
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208     http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane


On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 at 02:31, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> wrote:

> NTP working group,
>
>
>
> The Updating the NTP Registries draft has passed WGLC; however, during the
> shepherd writeup process, we identified that it should be Standards track
> instead of Informational. Rich has updated/uploaded a new version of the
> draft that addresses this and a few editorial issues raised by Dieter.
> Given the change in status, we would like to issue a very short review of
> the WGLC to see if there are any concerns regarding the change in document
> type. Please respond if you have any questions or concerns by Friday 5
> August.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-update-registries/
>
>
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
> Karen
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email