IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 16 January 2020 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F507120110; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:02:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.404
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.404 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.275, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MfYiur4Lz6-E; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C6EF12008F; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 00G02iKN003664 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:02:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1579132969; bh=Uu9Ab4KF6Nn9WMozKet2r4SX2FqKHp2yyDCxcOFO0gg=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=iwLLML7M3YcxdeMKYFXVt4fOkXw2TLpodbUhqLvX0nB+hA/Gnd5ZRclqkBpwO7ZSh 6DwwWsvV5RreyoDwntjoEtOGXgp6BumBFRgxqXZh62MnRy1w36WzGvVcFVAuCfXOap BdhSksHCSid9FOJwRkyFVZjkdP/soCDSJoaGM2m0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: "Ganga, Ilango S" <ilango.s.ganga@intel.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve@ietf.org>, Jesse Gross <jesse@kernel.org>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, "matthew.bocci@nokia.com" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, "nvo3-chairs@ietf.org" <nvo3-chairs@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "T. Sridhar" <tsridhar@vmware.com>
References: <157552467812.11318.10528346914636467776.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <C5A274B25007804B800CB5B289727E35906A48FA@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <72a3fb2a-e944-6b0f-1efb-5145ade5c948@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:02:38 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C5A274B25007804B800CB5B289727E35906A48FA@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1686E6D9288F8247881BB4B9"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/CY9lnc6Q7GFluxKXcbZV0mny7T0>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:02:56 -0000

On 1/15/20 4:51 PM, Ganga, Ilango S wrote:
>
> “Geneve is designed to support network virtualization use cases for 
> data center environments, where tunnels are typically established to 
> act as a backplane between the virtual switches residing in 
> hypervisors, physical switches, or middleboxes or other appliances.”
>

Thanks! This sounds good. I'd even be fine with simpler language that 
explains that, even when used between data centers, GENEVE is expected 
to be deployed in a way that avoids the use of NAT technology.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email