Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 17 February 2012 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1509E21F8523 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:53:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tgS3l+3u+RPJ for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:53:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AA821F8514 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:53:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 355 invoked by uid 399); 17 Feb 2012 17:53:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.57?) (pbs:robert@raszuk.net@83.28.249.110) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTPM; 17 Feb 2012 17:53:12 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 83.28.249.110
Message-ID: <4F3E9405.8070602@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:53:09 +0100
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
References: <201202171451.q1HEptR3027370@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>, <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C70661A@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <5E613872-0E27-46D2-8097-B31E7F0F37C5@mimectl> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C70669D@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <4F3E851F.6060604@raszuk.net> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C9148D8@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <4F3E898C.3000605@raszuk.net> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C914924@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C914924@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "narten@us.ibm.com" <narten@us.ibm.com>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "david.black@emc.com" <david.black@emc.com>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, Adrian Farrel <afarrel@juniper.net>, Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:53:20 -0000

Hi John,

> Btw, are you aware of the VM mobility
> draft:http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raggarwa-data-center-mobility/?

The most interesting there is the section 6.2 attempting to propose ways 
to avoid inter-dc triangular routing after VM migration.

However I am not keen on host routes injection even in the limited 
radius (which may not be possible in hybrid cloud cases) nor NHRP 
proposal from section 6.2.3.

IMHO much better class of solutions are already documented in LISP 
and/or ILNP documents. They solve the same problem in much more elegant 
way. Note that those can be deployed within one's administration domain 
boundaries only or extend beyond given domain (for example to given 
domain's customers).

Many thx,
R.