[nvo3] Active OAM encapsulation for Geneve

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DB7120046 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 11:49:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CWp2gLWIJDt0 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 11:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A3F12003E for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 11:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r19so913615ljg.3 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:49:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KFfXZCT67WwgZm/LVqV0EJuXt2qOcThkBW+pEm1A2N0=; b=Qj7C4qDyAxe2unyALYPodvd0fSdDqeXDLvSkjlIYSkTrLh58JfUl/mWWwv2KHv0XL5 OVXoB70ccYW4KJZwcBofltE0cSxkllgH9e4AQnhKkueZbJnU7Zm8yBPqHGn+Vt6uCMl0 gxzr1xUegmmerrMgZigj2zD3YempVWVWhOIwdEKzduwLwx6nLVMuUFBSpYpzhn86h4n/ t68XWKRz/VoUllCbom5HCN3xiGlXSBolmgAVHLZhlxdaoxmuP2N2REvYV7yCcV9OTpxw Y9x3sB7d9R2b2Pd/yB2/TgqVCt2oXUfeP/VvMs2JoCiH3iZZpGXC52bZLYp2RsA/00fq 6Ypw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KFfXZCT67WwgZm/LVqV0EJuXt2qOcThkBW+pEm1A2N0=; b=l2WUsuW2MwKtydEoRNh1QOGy023UbRmChiEcQgLG7+4q1HKxsAxK1/C6vlzkHCLHvW jjfVyOI649LQnnOjyjFd2cs1he4BLEsJbmLk82a6bP8WZbhn1G/sK4q1r/Hy+lb890BQ zG+RpXz+0w+kY11x8tnL6+daRtPTkFPDvlLmMrB8O92Jy2MyWImUmLcee/OmisYGrppM CKLv+Wzzmcdabtks0fp9AeQ+Nh/Hqqq/zxdFUqva3Fjhr/xsW0xDFr+t/SoF0OjCpNLt VnG7lggsVOkeWYyitJ4HnrhfDDZ76DlGfxUGpKyYZP9FHZlL0RrI7GXPpt4Ox7DxbYD5 4I5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWWLnZqJQcXRhy3sXOmPsnIwW6DEEOVl2AKqQMIjLDG35dQU+u3 zSEiRfNLtu+q9jxO0//y+xZDhFdB6wGusNbr6aH2L7qE
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNQ6+Fvw+9t6eGGw/HiOmblfaO3TaM/swhVFtk0Q16Ux3jZ0vfjQMWmseVGEuLRYWZ+hK+xoV6Gh6m4dkytSU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:c42:: with SMTP id o2mr312390ljd.222.1575316179884; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:49:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 14:49:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmX-Xsxuic46d=9OwPGcQvjhNtKap_pfc+rscjUq5hBsCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: NVO3 <nvo3@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f9fc20598bde110"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/aXoHax-qzYbBGvGkAZp1s0YlS8E>
Subject: [nvo3] Active OAM encapsulation for Geneve
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 19:49:44 -0000

Dear All,
though there was no formal discussion of draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam-00> in Singapore,
I've captured one comment that is, in my view, is very much relevant to
resolving the question posted in the draft:

Not all stacks support MPLS encapsulation.

Consequently, the proposed in the third paragraph of Section 2.1
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam-00#section-2.1> use
of MPLS GAL is not a viable solution. Could people familiar with the
deployments share their expertise and experiences?

Regards,
Greg