Re: [nwcrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-02.txt

Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr> Thu, 05 March 2020 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B593A16BB for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 07:52:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PtzEPtM8ue1v for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 07:52:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.cnes.fr (mx2.cnes.fr [194.199.174.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA49D3A16B8 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 07:51:57 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,518,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="33398917"
X-IPAS-Result: A2FjBACNHmFe/wIBeAplHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgXuCKVkTdRIqCpUekCaJMYFdCgkBAQEBAQEBAQEgDQcBAgQBAYRDAoIPJDgTAhABAQEFAQEBAQEFAgEBAgJphQpMAQuGOQIBAwEBbBsCAQUDDRUkJwslAgQKCQgMB4MMgnsPpz4ahB8CDkGFTYE4gWWMXIERR4JNPoJkAQECAQEYgQsEPINBgiwEl1+YQgeBQX6CUYUBh3eHOXiBUYEAhyGEOgOMDY51iHyUYiOBRAwIMxonKyGCbAlHGJcxhUFEMIEhCIxMAYEPAQE
X-URL-LookUp-ScanningError: 1
From: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
To: "nwcrg@irtf.org" <nwcrg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nwcrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHV8wVlrifkNyitmEuIcE5Cjb71H6g6JQvA
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 15:50:54 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:51:54 +0000
Message-ID: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1ED67AFB@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
References: <158342324764.14809.6292123115572006230@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158342324764.14809.6292123115572006230@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.100.1062-25272.000
x-tm-as-result: No--19.484500-0.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/5b1A-n7aymOB3OOeSgH1p_efhOY>
Subject: Re: [nwcrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-02.txt
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 15:52:03 -0000

Dear all, 

As promising in our answer to Vincent's review, here is a *-02 version of the draft.
Please let us know if you have any comments and we may be able to provide an updated version before the cut-off. 

At IETF107, we plan on explaining :
- what has been done since IETF106 and Vincent's review 
- what we think are the future steps for this document

Cheers, 

Nico


-----Message d'origine-----
De : nwcrg <nwcrg-bounces@irtf.org> De la part de internet-drafts@ietf.org
Envoyé : jeudi 5 mars 2020 16:47
À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc : nwcrg@irtf.org
Objet : [nwcrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-02.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Coding for efficient NetWork Communications Research Group RG of the IRTF.

        Title           : Coding and congestion control in transport
        Authors         : Nicolas Kuhn
                          Emmanuel Lochin
                          Francois Michel
                          Michael Welzl
	Filename        : draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-02.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2020-03-05

Abstract:
   FEC coding is a reliability mechanism that is distinct and separate
   from the loss detection of congestion controls.  Using FEC coding can
   be a useful way to deal with transfer tail losses or with networks
   having non-congestion losses.  However, FEC coding mechanisms should
   not hide congestion signals.  This memo offers a discussion of how
   FEC coding and congestion control can coexist.  Another objective is
   to encourage the research community to also consider congestion
   control aspects when proposing and comparing FEC coding solutions in
   communication systems.

   This document is the product of the Coding for Efficient Network
   Communications Research Group (NWCRG).  The scope of the document is
   end-to-end communications: FEC coding for tunnels is out-of-the scope
   of the document.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-02
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-02

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-02


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/


_______________________________________________
nwcrg mailing list
nwcrg@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg