Re: [nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Mon, 25 November 2019 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE5F120964 for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:18:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ACsWVwXduI6u for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:18:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out01.uio.no (mail-out01.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFCB1120963 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:18:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx02.uio.no ([129.240.10.43]) by mail-out01.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1iZFCW-0002l6-4A; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:18:52 +0100
Received: from [202.153.86.209] (helo=[101.107.243.14]) by mail-mx02.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1iZFCU-00030k-IW; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:18:51 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-D76F9900-3E5D-4F0F-9722-02453673A246
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:18:44 +0500
Message-Id: <C80BE2B9-6B2F-4A3C-AF97-9DAEBBAACC9D@ifi.uio.no>
References: <F437B105-EDDA-4146-9067-A4BE557AC00D@inria.fr>
Cc: nwcrg@irtf.org, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
In-Reply-To: <F437B105-EDDA-4146-9067-A4BE557AC00D@inria.fr>
To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A878)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx02.uio.no: 202.153.86.209 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=202.153.86.209; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=[101.107.243.14];
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: A98DFE2043AC93F382D4E9B99F4DCDB212B8FFF5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/HaDZTRSc8EGY_tnWqtwy_Ce7YaM>
Subject: Re: [nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:18:57 -0000

I agree that this would be good to accept.

Cheers,
Michael


Sent from my iPhone

> On 25 Nov 2019, at 19:10, Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> It was suggested during ietf106 meeting to promote the following document as RG Item draft:
> 
> 	Coding and congestion control in transport 
> 	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kuhn-coding-congestion-transport
> 
> Many feedback have already been received during the meeting, mostly positive. We, co-chairs,
> also highlighted that this document has been long awaited.
> 
> When asked whether we should adopt it, nobody objected among those physically or remotely 
> (meetecho) present. We would now like to confirm this on the list.
> 
> If you object to having this I-D be RG Item draft, please tell us by Monday Dec. 2nd.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>   Marie-Jose and vincent
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nwcrg mailing list
> nwcrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg