IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nwcrg] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-irtf-nwcrg-network-coding-satellites-13: (with COMMENT)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 23 May 2020 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060463A0F20 for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2020 15:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t0qc2qbm7Ilr for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2020 15:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C58D3A0F1F for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 23 May 2020 15:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.119] (p548dc699.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.198.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49Tysf2NTBzyV1; Sun, 24 May 2020 00:37:25 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <1979087903.4370016.1590272055526@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 00:37:21 +0200
Cc: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, "Stuart W. Card" <stu.card@critical.com>, nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 611966241.453697-903e61d2ea630c3dab1008117c3e6396
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A3DB9E4-85F1-43F8-811B-9A2981278ED1@tzi.org>
References: <159015933944.21205.1257920058480954416@ietfa.amsl.com> <24177699.3708839.1590198759351@mail.yahoo.com> <6053418d-c47e-1e1e-8d03-a0b5eeb9848c@critical.com> <1979087903.4370016.1590272055526@mail.yahoo.com>
To: "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/SzxUwF86GgHSZuYjlexCjrsO1P8>
Subject: Re: [nwcrg] Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-irtf-nwcrg-network-coding-satellites-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 22:37:36 -0000

> On 2020-05-24, at 00:14, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I doubt that
> network coding across a path including a satellite link can beat the
> coding and modulation that can be dynamically applied to the satellite
> link.

Very likely so.  But the keyword is “can be applied”.  Is it?
When is the clunky sat terminal written off and up for renewal?

This is the (not so unlikely) situation where LOOPS-style in-network recovery can be useful even for satellite losses.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email