Re: [nwcrg] [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps

Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com> Thu, 25 July 2019 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827E31200A4 for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BWKilJWlGAmF for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ABF012016A for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id k8so96906151iot.1 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PC3A+1B3wjsVi5L1AqT3rzZ4/qcTaLOcpzgC97RoBa0=; b=duLMJmZjSP1fxMTRk4EQAbIn0YfiKyuzWX6qNfOVAPyDOabvUHM+2Sa0pPbgEqN5eV Vcu+Dtfe5j92Fd4s9qJWfWCXuRV8hczll0RFXX0pLa8Q6X4xtF1jgnPS3JBwJEXZyewk piouLY1otkW/s58drXaBqDWtVcc5himOu1O3lsHYi8Kp0vQb0Os+cZvyMg0n8EbAjyuB ECqzYZqW+7tYuME/7uU5t0uf39bdpc2quhaRFmDK++h1UOZA4S/Zsfx8qwEirUZ1EJWU YQ2wkkqKFeeCKP4T1xPLslS1cIvl4h1/P1Zmc4hAO5pHmJTJclJ2LNK4JExGwB+jOXjT 2tpQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PC3A+1B3wjsVi5L1AqT3rzZ4/qcTaLOcpzgC97RoBa0=; b=BxQpYUpzvQrNQBbyApldUy9M15wgrw/VqakVksQXhAsf1/awTafWOrlDLIUJvfk0jh JBvDxyzE76v7TQJ4qpWtReTtlZ/FkrZaWF7r4YazPuPeFVDpsGTNoIxV9JwQTGPsHKZl ENBarJWAMAX5KyXnY0dxZV5gyeGzTic1rhH2FicFfqBMKiI5JRbAq76rqiHNhIaE/Hmg WWvQBC8/VWvrwmhGTNF9rq4gYnTWyrhI0NGvo/jCT29+pezyd/r7oKR6Ub3UfnRmq4mt 1xYzlG2bUr8hm5r7JdNwIwahCff9aqPx+fRBsI4r2FupcHJD3mY+6GZq2KzceXCpKN8o cJ3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWiQaq1OYq2sfc2+PbHQi1XlnXKXmwrFba6c9J3IslgWUxgmatW 6/pBZuSkOCPYXnYXXwvX60ZtYoZJZHshFy11azBMVXnm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzdwQpt39IIZ+ReUu328eg5s1aoP7G494dU9WP7lwXcXpayfkPtEzPiioqdr3g1o2qBzSK/Lyi3QqR0hdnFruY=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:8814:: with SMTP id r20mr94766607jai.115.1564058095453; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:34:55 -0700
From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
In-Reply-To: <E6659E42-D6D7-4033-B4D6-9305823063D2@tzi.org>
References: <CAKKJt-eRGJe+9PtEC7xgFz+HA0zsr_sR0NUgKRmJ-P5Q3XBg-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjWiCSbPioTHkYBpX73qxzO=H1sJDZpCMCKzBKoU4rZLLhwMQ@mail.gmail.com> <E6659E42-D6D7-4033-B4D6-9305823063D2@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:34:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPjWiCSAWJ1YYAhDQR13esNPDdO+hG4iZtfVACbb8VAGD=JCHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: loops@ietf.org, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "nwcrg@irtf.org" <nwcrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000301181058e80a7ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/TF835bCPXttNBWOVsuyXDjKGtcY>
Subject: Re: [nwcrg] [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:34:59 -0000

Adding the nwcrg list to list thread. And with my NWCRG co-chair hat on.

Like I mentioned the WIFI to node hop was one of the original successes of
network coding as Prof. Médard and her team can attest to. A lot of the
LOOPS use cases for per hop network optimization have been not only
*researched* but *implemented* with running code by many of the nwcrg
participants.

NWCRG-ites; there was a LOOPS BOF on Monday to address the issues of
performance in multiple hop networks and Carsten is pointing to the related
material.


mjm
Marie-José Montpetit, Ph.D.
Research Affiliate, MIT Media Laboratory
mariejose@mjmontpetit.com
mariejo@mit.edu

On July 25, 2019 at 12:56:37 AM, Carsten Bormann (cabo@tzi.org) wrote:

On Jul 24, 2019, at 18:17, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
wrote:
>
> Standardisation of what? The architecture? The protocols (beware there is
already FECFRAME and others)? The proxies?

Hi Marie-José,

details of the thinking that was developed in the side meetings that
happened at the previous two IETF meetings can be found at

https://github.com/loops-wg/charter

The BOF actually added one piece of information I didn’t previously
perceive that way:
People seem to really want to tackle the host-to-node case (as needed,
e.g., for going through WiFi access clouds) right away, not just the
in-network (node-to-node) case. That would be the one thing I would change
based on my recollection of the BOF. But of course there may be other
things; it may be worth to now have another round of discussion of the
proposed charter.

Grüße, Carsten