IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?

Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr> Mon, 25 November 2019 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD32A120960 for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:09:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2GjD7wutbGed for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:09:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F511120880 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:09:56 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,241,1571695200"; d="scan'208,217";a="413389030"
Received: from moucherotte.inrialpes.fr ([194.199.28.14]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2019 15:09:54 +0100
From: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_856E1A19-D8E8-4CF2-BD49-193EF4E20625"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Message-Id: <F437B105-EDDA-4146-9067-A4BE557AC00D@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:09:54 +0100
Cc: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
To: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/qRJya0k5fndqFcbH2JS4H0A5pso>
Subject: [nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:09:59 -0000

Dear all,

It was suggested during ietf106 meeting to promote the following document as RG Item draft:

	Coding and congestion control in transport 
	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kuhn-coding-congestion-transport

Many feedback have already been received during the meeting, mostly positive. We, co-chairs,
also highlighted that this document has been long awaited.

When asked whether we should adopt it, nobody objected among those physically or remotely 
(meetecho) present. We would now like to confirm this on the list.

If you object to having this I-D be RG Item draft, please tell us by Monday Dec. 2nd.

Cheers,

  Marie-Jose and vincent

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email